Waugh at Knossos

A quote from Waugh features in a portion of Prof. Mary Beard’s recent book Confronting the Classics that has been posted on the history website Erenow. In a chapter entitled “Builder of Ruins” describing the excavation and restoration of the ruins at Knossos in Crete by Sir Arthur Evans in the early 20th Century, she opens with a cite to Waugh’s Labels. In this passage, Waugh describes his reaction to Evans’ somewhat controversial methods:

Evelyn Waugh was characteristically unimpressed by the remains of the prehistoric Minoan palace at Knossos and its famous decoration. His 1930 travelogue, Labels, contains a memorable account of his disappointment, not so much at the excavation site itself (‘where,’ he writes archly, ‘Sir Arthur Evans 
 is rebuilding the palace’) but at its collection of prize paintings and sculpture, which had been removed to the museum in Heraklion. In the sculpture, he ‘saw nothing to suggest any genuine aesthetic feeling at all’. The frescoes were much more difficult to judge, ‘since only a few square inches of the vast area exposed to our consideration are earlier than the last twenty years, and it is impossible to disregard the suspicion that their painters have tempered their zeal for accurate reconstructions with a somewhat inappropriate predilection for covers of Vogue.’

It seems to have been relatively easy for Waugh, visiting soon after the paintings’ restoration, to spot quite how little of these masterpieces of Minoan art was actually Minoan. Almost a century on, and after a good deal of fading, most visitors to the Heraklion museum today are happily unaware that the icons of prehistoric Cretan culture that feature on thousands of postcards, posters and museum souvenirs…[are] largely recreations of the early twentieth century AD. Nor do most of them realise that those distinctively primitive, stumpy red columns, which are the trademark of the site of Knossos, are built wholly of modern concrete and are part of the ‘rebuilding’ by Evans.

Waugh goes on to visit the site where Evans is in the process of rebuilding the palace and concludes that

if he ever finishes even a part of this vast undertaking, it will be a place of oppressive wickedness. Labels (London, 1930, pp. 136-37).  

This same website recently posted the text from another of Prof. Beard’s books in which she quoted Waugh’s description of the Parthenon, also from Labels. See earlier post.

Share
Posted in Academia, Art, Photography & Sculpture, Labels | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Waugh at Knossos

Guardian Reviews Brideshead Dramatization

The Guardian in today’s edition joins the other metropolitan dailies (Mail, Telegraph, and Times) in reviewing the stage production of Brideshead Revisited which is now touring the provinces. As in many previous cases, the verdict of the Guardian’s drama critic Alfred Hickling is mixed:

…if the plot sometines drags, there are some fine performances along the way…Cruden’s minimalist production certainly looks stylish. Sara Perks’ design keeps the stage clear of period clutter… [It] becomes increasingly evident that this adaptation cannot survive on charm alone. A third of the playing time is devoted to the deathbed capitulation of the old apostate Marchmain; though Waugh’s bedazzlement with aristocratic Catholicism is a trial even readers of the book found difficult to endure. The novelist Henry Green noted “my heart was in my mouth all through the deathbed scene, hoping against hope that the old man would not give way”. Here, at the tail end of a languid evening, one hopes against hope that extreme unction may be delivered before the last bus home…The saving grace is a splendidly louche performance from Christopher Simpson as the infantile, teddy-bear-dependent, alcoholic Sebastian… He provides, without question, the heart and soul of the production. Yet once he absconds to drink himself to death in a Tunisian monastery, the heart goes missing, leaving only the problem of the soul to be dealt with.

Another review by Claire Hayes to much the same effect may be found on The Reviews Hub. The production is playing at the Theatre Royal in Bath through Saturday, 7 May and opens at the Nuffield Theatre in S0uthampton next Tuesday (10 May) for a five day run.

Share
Posted in Adaptations, Brideshead Revisited, Theater | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Guardian Reviews Brideshead Dramatization

Waugh Graves (More)

A newspaper website called This is the West Country (made up of local papers including the Taunton Star, the Bridgwater Mercury, and the Somerset County Gazette) carries a story with additional details of the problems arising from permissions to repair the gravesite of Evelyn Waugh, his second wife and his daughter Margaret. See earlier posts. The story again acknowledges that the Waugh Family, as quoted by Alexander Waugh in the article, is prepared to pay for necessary repairs and improvements, including reparation of the retaining wall between the graves and the churchyard and steps from the churchyard up to the graves. A photo of the cracks in the retaining wall accompanies the article.  While the local council authorities and the local parish church and its governing archdeacon appear to support these actions, none will accept responsibility for issuing permission:

The Ven John Reed, Archdeacon of Taunton, said the upkeep and maintenance of the closed churchyard is Taunton Deane Borough Council’s responsibility. He added: “It’s very much in their gift to give permission to the plans put forward by the Waugh family, including the mending of the boundary wall between churchyard and the private plot of the Waugh family graves. If the graves were within the existing consecrated ground of the churchyard the plans could be sanctioned by the Church. Sadly the graves aren’t. The Parochial Church Council has and is continuing to do all it can in its diminutive capacity to help the Waugh family.”

A Taunton Deane Borough Council spokeswoman said: “Taunton Deane Borough Council is aware of the issues at Combe Florey and has done everything possible to try to achieve a resolution. However, it is unable to give permission for work on the retaining wall as it is not owned by the council and therefore it is not in the authority’s power to grant permission. While Taunton Deane carries out day-to-day maintenance in the closed churchyard, the land itself has not been transferred to the authority – ownership and management remain with the Church. The wall in question is a retaining wall, retaining private land behind the church and thus is taken to belong to the owner of the land retained and so it’s beyond our powers to authorise any works.”

A possible solution might be to have both the authorities of the church and local government issue statements that, in the presence of doubt and without claiming lawful  jurisdiction over the matters, each authority grants such permission “to the extent necessary and as might be within its powers if it possessed such jurisdiction” to proceed with the repairs and improvements.  In the alternative, they might simply state that neither has any objection to proceeding. That might not be as good as a building permit but should satisfy a cooperative building contractor. 

 

 

Share
Posted in Alexander Waugh, Articles, Combe Florey, Newspapers | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Waugh Graves (More)

Brideshead Reviewed in Bath

The English Touring Theatre’s production of Brideshead Revisited opened yesterday in Bath. The review in Bath Magazine by Melissa Blease found the adaptation “elegant” and the direction “artful”:

…whatever your take on the tale, this is a thoughtful, intelligent production of an exquisitely wrought eulogy to past times, vanished youth and bittersweet nostalgia, beautifully carried along by a multi-tasking ensemble cast
 and definitely worth revisiting.

Writing in the Bath Chronicle, Nancy Connolly thought the adaptation “very stark,” requiring the audience to imagine the story’s splendor, but deemed the production “courageous [to] lay bare an English country classic.” She

wonders if, when trying to reduce this epic to a stark two-hour production, the story has been lost somewhat in the process, although the staging even without the house and trappings is incredibly clever and modern. 

The unidentified reviewer in the Swindon Advertiser is struck unfavorably by the bare staging:

What results is something very modern, which is – unfortunately – strongly at odds with the source material, which goes to great lengths to evoke a certain time and place. This is Brideshead by Warhol, an odd mish-mash to say the least.

The cast “do their best to flourish” but except for Brian Ferguson as Charles 

we learn little of the deep emotions and motivations that guide them to their decisions. By trying to fit too many details and events into the short running time the production as a whole suffers.

The play is “ultimately hamstrung both by the odd staging and the stilted structure, over-promising and under-delivering.”

NOTE (7 May 2016): On Friday, 6 May 2016 another review of the Bath performance of the Brideshead adaptation was posted by Rebecca Lipkin on a website called The Arbuturian. This concludes more positively than some of the others:

This production might not have romantic backdrops of landscaped gardens or a soundtrack you can hum along to, but it’s all the more thought-provoking because of it. There is a depth and sensitivity pouring out of each cast member; all apparently united in their desire to tell the story of how one man’s life can be so affected by a desire to be a part of a class and family to which he was never destined to belong.

 

Share
Posted in Adaptations, Brideshead Revisited, Newspapers, Theater | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Brideshead Reviewed in Bath

Vile Bodies to be Celebrated at London Event

The Late Night Library Club of London had announced a rescheduled celebration of Waugh’s novel Vile Bodies and the Bright Young People who populated its pages. This will occur on Saturday, 25 June from 7pm-130am at the Sutton House Museum in Hackney E9. Here’s the announcement from the Late Night Library Club’s Facebook page: 

The third edition of Late Night Library Club is a repulsive celebration of Evelyn Waugh’s too too splendid novel, Vile Bodies. Join your fellow Bright Young People at the transformative Sutton House and immerse yourself in a night of drunk-making revelry.

Vile Bodies will see the return of host transdrogynous dandy La John Joseph; a truly spiritual performance from Mrs Ape and her angels presented by Ben Borowiecki, too too smashing choreography lessons with Babs Florence Ducane (mind the chandelier!); elocution lessons with Baroness Redesdale; hone your writing skills and contribute to gossip rag The Daily Excess with gutter guidance from the LNLC Chatterboxes; moving pictures in the You and Non-You Tube screening room; and dance the night away before you likely stumble upon No. 10 in the early hours for eggs and bacon.

Our BRAINBOX PANEL for the book club Q&A chapter of the Vile Bodies evening will be chaired by magnificent transdrogynous dandy La John Joseph, with panellists:
Duncan McLaren, author of the recently published ‘Evelyn!: Rhapsody for an Obsessive Love’; Rebecca Moore, PhD student at Leicester working on the Complete Works of Evelyn Waugh Project; David Levesley a journalist for Sky News (and more) who wrote and directed a Waugh estate-endorsed adaptation of Vile Bodies at the Warwick Arts Centre and V&A Museum in 2012.

More details, including tickets, are available here.

Share
Posted in Events, Humo(u)r, London, Vile Bodies | Tagged , | Comments Off on Vile Bodies to be Celebrated at London Event

Waugh Quotes in Wall Street Journal

The Wall Street Journal publishes a column called “Notable & Quotable” that features quotations worth further contemplation. The latest issue contains a quote from a letter Waugh sent to Thomas Merton in August 1948 advising him on how to improve his writing skills:

Never send off any piece of writing the moment it is finished. Put it aside. Take on something else. Go back to it a month later and re-read it. Examine each sentence and ask “Does this say precisely what I mean? Is it capable of misunderstanding? Have I used a clichĂ© where I could have invented a new and therefore asserting and memorable form? Have I repeated myself and wobbled round the point when I could have fixed the whole thing in six rightly chosen words? Am I using words in their basic meaning or in a loose plebeian way?” . . . The English language is incomparably rich and can convey every thought accurately and elegantly. The better the writing the less abstruse it is. Say “No” cheerfully and definitely to people who want you to do more than you can do well.

Most of this same quote appeared earlier this year in the artsblog of Terry Teachout, the WSJ’s drama critic, and this may have inspired its inclusion in the newspaper’s column. See earlier post. The letter is sourced to Mary Frances Coady, Merton & Waugh (2015).

This is the second time this year that a Waugh quote has featured in this column. On 26 February 2016 there was a quote from Waugh’s 1939 book Robbery Under Law regarding his definition of a conservative:

A conservative is not merely an obstructionist who wishes to resist the introduction of novelties; nor is he, as was assumed by most 19th-century parliamentarians, a brake to frivolous experiment. He has positive work to do . . . Civilization has no force of its own beyond what is given from within. It is under constant assault and it takes most of the energies of civilized man to keep going at all . . . If [it] falls we shall see not merely the dissolution of a few joint-stock corporations, but of the spiritual and material achievements of our history.

(Penguin Classics, 2011, p. 311). In both cases there are handsome photographs of Waugh heading the column, one smoking a cigar upon arrival in New York in 1947 and the other from 1935 in a bowler hat. These may not appear after the first link to the article unless you have a subscription.

NOTE (17 May 2016): An economist, Timothy Taylor, blogging as the “Conversable Economist”, was inspired by the WSJ quote of Waugh’s letter to Merton to read Mary Frances Coady’s book. His comments are posted here.

Share
Posted in Letters, Robbery Under Law | Tagged , | Comments Off on Waugh Quotes in Wall Street Journal

Brideshead Reviewed (Still More)

Another brief review of the Brideshead Revisited stage production has appeared in the Yorkshire Times and other local papers. This is by Lauren Masterman who writes:

As always with Damien Cruden as Artistic Director expect innovation and an imaginative combination of classic and contemporary techniques as he unleashes his talent on this brand new stage. This is a thrilling play from beginning to end; tumultuous friendships, dramatic outbursts, star-crossed lovers and more as we watch the unravelling of Charles Ryder and the Marchmain family.

The actress who plays Julia Flyte was also interviewed in connection with the recent premiere. This is Rosie Hilal and a transcript of the interview appeared on a theatrical internet news site The Bardette. Here’s the Q&A relating to the Brideshead performance:

Q. Describe Brideshead Revisited in 3 words.

A. Delicate. Heart-breaking. Redemptive.

Q. What has been your career highlight so far?

A. Playing Julia Flyte is pretty high on my list, as is playing Electra at the Globe last year. As parts go, they have been the meatiest so far, and the most challenging.

The production moves to Bath where it opens today at the Theatre Royal for a 5-day run.

Share
Posted in Adaptations, Brideshead Revisited, Theater | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Brideshead Reviewed (Still More)

NYPL Picks Famous Literary Breakup Lines

The New York Public Library asked its staff to suggest famous breakup lines from literary sources. This is on the occasion of the anniversary of the Pulitzer Prize awarded to Gone with the Wind where Rhett Butler left Scarlett O’Hara on her doorstep with the now classic “Frankly, my dear, I don’t give a damn.” The “frankly” was, according to the NYPL source, added for the film version. 

Evelyn Waugh makes an appearance with some parting lines of Adam and Nina in Vile Bodies:

“I say, Nina,” said Adam after some time, “we shan’t be able to get married after all.”

“No, I’m afraid not.”

“It is a bore, isn’t it?”

(Penguin, 1975, p. 83). This was suggested by Meredith Mann of the NYPL’s Electronic Resources Department who described it as an example of “blasĂ© gentility”. There are, however, several other equally poignant breakups between Adam and Nina yet to come in the novel. For example, on pp. 183-84 where in the course of two telephone conversations each breaks up with the other and on p. 197 where Adam tells her he’s done something extraordinary and won’t be able to see her again. As he explains, he sold her to his rival Ginger Littlejohn for £78.16.3 to settle his hotel bill. At the time Waugh wrote these lines,  he was rather obsessed with breakups because he had learned that his first wife had dumped him about half way through the book.  

 

 

Share
Posted in Articles, Humo(u)r, Vile Bodies | Tagged , , | Comments Off on NYPL Picks Famous Literary Breakup Lines

Handful Profiled in Indian Press

Today’s English-language edition of Mid-Day, a daily Mumbai compact newspaper, features an article that profiles Waugh’s 1934 novel A Handful of Dust and compares it to the social mores of the present day. This is by Aditya Sinha in his column “The Hippie Hindu.” The article begins by describing the book as “simultaneously a hilarious novel while being a most depressing read.” After summarizing the plot, Sinha continues

Waugh’s writing pierces the heart of two matters: marriage and human nature. Marriage is such a precarious and impossible Westphalian balance-of-power that it often ends in a Cold War type standoff, each partner held back by the fear of Mutually Assured Destruction (yes, marriage is MAD). Brenda’s feeling of imprisonment is uncannily familiar…In A Handful of Dust, Waugh takes the most intimate human connection, marriage, to reveal our wasteland of savagery; and if two people can’t escape the asphyxiation of association, then society likely can’t, either. No surprise that the modern world around us often seems more depressing than the saddest of stories. Waugh got his novel’s title from TS Eliot’s The Waste Land, which says: “our society promises to show us fear, in a handful of dust”. That possibly exemplifies our modern condition.

Sinha also manages to get in a mention of Waugh’s follow-on novel  Scoop (1938) which he describes as:

a riotous look at journalism through stylised prose…[that] never resorts to abuse, [in] contrast to the illiterate hordes in contemporary India, whose intellectual achievement is to call journalists “presstitutes”. 

Share
Posted in A Handful of Dust, Articles, Newspapers, Scoop | Tagged , | Comments Off on Handful Profiled in Indian Press

Waugh on Queueing

In today’s Canberra Times there is an article about the prospect faced by Canberrans of the need to queue for tickets to popular events such as hockey matches. This is apparently an unusual feature of life in Canberra, a city that is small enough to avoid the need for queueing, a phenomenon which the writer of the article (Ian Warden) says is more typical of England:

Perhaps because of my English working-class background, I have always had a fondness, an aptitude, even a genius for queuing. Traditionally the English are accomplished, virtuoso queuers. In one of Evelyn Waugh’s novels there are docile working-class Londoners who go out looking for queues to join, never asking what it is they are queueing for.

Warden must be thinking of Waugh’s novel Unconditional Surrender which begins with the description of a queue that has formed outside Westminster Abbey to view a sword that will be presented to the Soviet Union in gratitude for their help in winning WWII:

The people of England were long habituated to queues; some had joined the procession ignorant of its end–hoping perhaps for cigarettes or shoes–but most were in a mood of devotion…Already the police were turning away the extremity of the queue saying:”You won’t get in today. Come back tomorrow morning–early,” and the people obediently drifted into the dusk to join other queues elsewhere (Unconditional Surender, New York, 2012, pp. 15-16, 31).

 

Share
Posted in Newspapers, Unconditional Surrender/The End of the Battle | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Waugh on Queueing