Evelyn Waugh Studies 55.1 (Spring 2024)

The Society is pleased to post the latest edition of its journal Evelyn Waugh Studies. This is No. 55.1 (Spring 2024). The contents are described by the Society’s Secretary Jamie Collinson as follows:

The winner of the EWS’ 2023 Undergraduate Essay Contest takes the lead in edition 55.1 of Evelyn Waugh Studies, which is available here, courtesy of Jonathan Pitcher and Yuexi Liu. Faith Adams’ fascinating essay examines Waugh’s satire and modernism in Vile Bodies, and how media and celebrity culture feature in the novel.

Waugh’s late masterpiece, The Ordeal of Gilbert Pinfold, is the latest of his works to be published in the Oxford University Press’ Complete Works editions, edited by noted Waugh scholar Barbara Cooke of Loughborough University. Vincenzo Barney reviews the book for EWS, under the unbeatable title ‘Portrait of the Artist off His Onion.’

Share
Posted in Evelyn Waugh Studies, The Ordeal of Gilbert Pinfold | Leave a comment

Alexander Waugh: Times Newspaper Obituary

The Times newspaper has also posted a thoughtful obituary of Alexander Waugh:

“Alexander Waugh had few illusions about the antecedents of his vast literary clan. In his irreverent family memoir, Fathers and Sons (2004), the son of Auberon Waugh and grandson of Evelyn revealed that the family traced their origins back to the 17th century. However, rather than possessing aristocratic connections, Waugh said they were of yeoman stock from the Scottish Borders, where “I suspect they ate their porridge with their fingers”.

Furthermore, he added, according to the Oxford English Dictionary, Waugh meant “tasteless, insipid; unpleasant to the smell or taste, sickly, faint, weak, etc”, while as a noun it was “an exclamation indicating grief, indignation or the like. Now chiefly as attributed to N American Indians and other savages”.

His memoir detailed the perennially difficult relationships he, along with his father, grandfather and even great-grandfather, had with their fathers. Given that three of these were professional writers, “I would be absolutely amazed if there was any other family in the world which could produce such a huge documentation of the relations between fathers and sons”.

The cycle began with his great-great-grandfather Dr Alexander Waugh, who was known in the family as “the Brute”. Evelyn Waugh went on to have an unhappy relationship with his father, Arthur Waugh, but more from neglect in favour of his elder brother, Alec. Evelyn himself had little time for his own children, writing in 1946 that “the presence of my children affects me with deep weariness and depression”, and adding that five-year-old Auberon “is clumsy and dishevelled, sly, without intellectual, aesthetic or spiritual interest”. Auberon, equally, had little time for his father, remarking that such was his indifference, he would have gladly exchanged him for a tin whistle.

Alexander Waugh’s relationship with his father, Auberon, the indefatigable satirist and columnist, was at times challenging. Throughout his childhood, his father never called him by his Christian name, preferring “Fat Fool”, “Nige” or “Wilf”, and never had serious conversations with him, cared about his schoolwork or how he did at cricket, or recommended books for him to read.

However much he may have been hurt by this indifference, Alexander concluded: “He provided a more stable upbringing to his four children than he himself had ever received, and left more goodwill towards the name than he had inherited 
 I adored my father, more, I suppose, than he adored me, or at least I thought about him much more than he thought of me — but I do not repine, as the Wavian saying goes, for that is the nature of any father–son relationship. A father may have many children to add to his many concerns but a son has only one father.”

Apart from Fathers and Sons, which was written at the suggestion of the author Sir VS Naipaul (obituary August 12, 2018), he wrote a number of highly regarded books, including a history of the Wittgenstein family, and others on music and specifically on time and God. He also had a varied career, ranging from record producer to cartoonist and opera critic. In 2000, he wrote the music for Bon Voyage! — a “musical farce”. He also amassed a considerable archive on his grandfather Evelyn, discovering the yet to be published correspondence between the writer and his unrequited love, Teresa “Baby” Jungman (obituary June 15, 2010), who died aged 102.

Evelyn Waugh scholars who contacted him were often invited to stay at his farmhouse in Somerset, where he housed the archive. He was general editor of the definitive 43 volumes of Oxford University Press’s The Complete Works of Evelyn Waugh, of which nearly half have been published.

However, he was far better known to the public at large for his passionate advocacy of the questionable belief that the 17th Earl of Oxford, Edward de Vere, was in fact the true author of Shakespeare’s plays and sonnets. Until this controversy arose, Lord Oxford was better known for a reference in John Aubrey’s Brief Lives. While making low obeisance to Queen Elizabeth I, he accidentally broke wind, so went into self-imposed exile in Europe for several years. On welcoming him home, the first thing the queen said was: “My Lord, I had forgott the Fart.”

A large part of the argument appeared to be that a provincial like Shakespeare never had the learning or access to material that would enable him to write such works, whereas an aristocrat such as the Earl of Oxford would. Leading Shakespearean scholars, such as Sir Jonathan Bate, completely dismiss this notion. Since 2016, Alexander Waugh was chairman of the De Vere Society, which promotes this belief. Waugh also asserted that a number of obscure codes and cryptic clues proved it.

In a celebrated debate in 2017 with Waugh, Bate said in essence that Waugh’s arguments were based on a series of coincidences, conspiracies and cryptograms, which while adding to the gaiety of nations, were specious, and perhaps could be explained because Waugh came from a family of contrarians who all loved aristocrats, with his father and grandfather both marrying them.

Dr Paul Edmondson, another Shakespearean scholar, declared: “These theories just seem to get more and more fantastic and take us into the realms of science fiction and fantasy novels. This has always been part of the fascination of those who are seeking to disprove authenticated history.” Another difficulty with this theory is that more than 12 of Shakespeare’s plays were likely to have been written and performed after De Vere’s death in 1604, including Macbeth, King Lear, Antony and Cleopatra and The Tempest. However, apologists for the so-called “Oxfordian theory” simply say the dating of these plays is open to question.

Alexander Evelyn Michael Waugh was born in 1963, the son of Auberon Waugh and the former Lady Teresa Onslow. He was brought up in Combe Florey, the Somerset house that had passed to Auberon on the death of Evelyn in 1966. There were nine wine cellars in the house, filled to capacity by Auberon. In his oration at the Saintsbury Club in 2015, Alexander explained how his father kept extensive wine lists in the lavatory for casual reading. “His [Auberon Waugh’s] fee for ad hoc journalism was 24 bottles per thousand words, so that when commissioning editors telephoned, in the name of tax efficiency he ran to the lavatory, to choose two cases from the lists. If he found the door locked from the inside, he became quite hysterical: ‘Get out of there, you bugger. Someone’s on the phone and needing to know which wine I want.’ ”

Alexander explained that they were first introduced to wine at the table from the age of five, graduating to full glasses at 12. “Throughout my teenage years I was deputed to catalogue his cellar, to carry cases down and bring the bottles up, to uncork and decant for every meal, and I spent many afternoons destroying empty boxes or re-racking according to his latest caprice. I was in effect his cellarer, his editor, his yeoman and his sommelier.”

Even more trying was his father’s insistence that they describe the taste of the wines: “If we said the wine was ‘jolly good’ or ‘absolutely delicious’ we were censured. ‘Words,’ he said, ‘are there to be called upon; do please try harder.’ I felt the pressure to conjure colourful epithets keenly and resented the fortnightly three-line whips to engage in his Spectator Wine Club tastings.”

Alexander went to Manchester University, where he met and later married Eliza Chancellor, daughter of the editor and journalist Alexander Chancellor. He graduated in musical studies and later worked as an impresario and concert agent as well as producing a series of award-winning recordings of classical music.

After Alexander went to university, his father’s wine arrangements fell into disarray, so Auberon developed the notion that his son would return to live in the gatehouse of Combe Florey and become an independent wine merchant. Apprenticeships were arranged with a London wine merchant and even with Steven Spurrier (obituary March 20, 2021) in Paris, but this came to naught as Alexander feared he would go bankrupt with such a venture. Instead, he developed his interest in music and in the early Nineties became an opera critic for The Mail on Sunday and the Evening Standard. He remained popular with his fellow critics but never excelled in this pursuit. One leading critic recalled that whenever the conductor raised his baton at the commencement of the opera, Alexander would repeat quite audibly: “Ready, steady 
 go!”

He enjoyed a busy social life with his family at their farmhouse in rural Somerset. Life centred around the kitchen with life-sized portraits of Queen Charlotte and King George III overlooking an oversized dining table. Guests would later gather around the grand piano for sessions playing popular music from the 1930s. He took considerable delight in cooking elaborate meals with serious wines to accompany them. In 2011, like his father before him, he was elected to the exclusive Saintsbury Club of 50 oenophiles who met twice annually in Vintners Hall to drink vintage bordeaux and burgundy. However, he resigned in 2020, along with several other members, when a motion to allow female members was narrowly defeated.

With his wife Eliza, whom he married in 1990, he had three children: Mary, a teacher, Sally, a lawyer, and Auberon (Bron), a comedian and writer. All survive him.

Last year, he revealed during yet another debate on Shakespeare’s origins that he was suffering from inoperable prostate cancer, and in his final weeks at home moved his bed into the library to make it easier for his many friends to gather around. He bore his imminent demise with resigned equanimity and was especially heartened to have lived long enough to meet his first grandchildren, twin girls.

In a postscript to his son in Fathers and Sons, he urged him: “Bear the name of Waugh with pride. The Waugh name is not a satchel of rocks, or a blotchy birthmark, or a tuxedo with medals for you to swank about in. Do not let it browbeat you into thinking you have to become a writer, that it is your destiny or your duty to do so. It isn’t. There is no point in writing unless you have something to say and are determined to say it well.” He ended with some words of advice: “Beware of seriousness: it is a form of stupidity. Fear boredom. Never use the word ‘ersatz’.”

Alexander Waugh, author, was born on December 30, 1963. He died of cancer on July 22, 2024, aged 60″

Share
Posted in Alexander Waugh, Newspapers, Obituaries | Leave a comment

Alexander Waugh 1963-2024 R.I.P.

We have received the sad news of the death of Alexander Waugh earlier this week. He has been a supporter and officer of the Society since its inception and we will truly miss him. Here is a copy of his obituary from the Daily Telegraph as posted in Yahoo News:

“Alexander Waugh, who has died aged 60, was the son of the columnist Auberon Waugh and grandson of the novelist Evelyn Waugh, and a widely accomplished and colourful character in his own right.

A composer, opera and literary critic, cartoonist, writer and sometime publisher, he was also keeper of what remained (after the sale of his grandfather’s library to the University of Texas in 1968) of the family archive, and general editor of a planned 43-volume edition of Evelyn Waugh’s complete works, published by Oxford University Press.

Alexander Waugh’s own books included Fathers and Sons: The Autobiography of a Family (2004), a memoir which showed that he had inherited his full measure of the family’s eccentric and provocative wit, while also demonstrating the distinctiveness of his own voice and a literary talent that needed no help from his illustrious forebears.

Other inherited traits were his hatred of bossiness and pomposity, his tendency to nip at the heels of sacred cows, his mischievous distrust of received opinion and established orthodoxies – leanings that eventually drew Waugh into the vexed Shakespeare authorship question.

A tenacious researcher and an entertaining debater, he proved a doughty opponent of the Stratfordian professoriate (“a tight world of whipping and censorship and dogma” in his words), and stimulated lively controversy as honorary president of the Shakespeare Authorship Coalition, and later, from 2016, as chairman of the De Vere Society, which promotes research to support the proposition that Edward de Vere, 17th Earl of Oxford, was the true author of the works attributed to William Shakespeare of Stratford.

Heretical instincts also led Waugh to question the ethics and efficacy of the Covid vaccination jabs and lockdown restrictions, and to stand for the Brexit Party in Bridgwater and West Somerset in the 2019 general election.

“If I am elected,” he declared, “I shall do everything in my power to help to restore honesty, integrity, trust and democracy to our now broken system of government and to ensure that Britain is put back in command of its own money, laws and borders. When these things are achieved, when we are once again a properly democratic nation, I shall return to the gorgeous green pastures of West Somerset to get on with the rest of my life.”

Waugh’s wit won him standing ovations at the hustings, but shortly before the election the party leader Nigel Farage decided to stand down the candidates in seats with a Conservative MP. “I can’t deny in some ways I am quite relieved, because I am not a politician,” said Waugh. “I just thought sitting in my armchair complaining wasn’t very good. I am a man of action.”

Alexander Evelyn Michael Waugh was born in London on December 30 1963, the second of four children of Auberon Waugh, known to family and friends as “Bron”, and his wife Lady Teresa, daughter of the 6th Earl of Onslow and later a successful novelist and translator.

Within a year of his birth, the family moved from London to Chilton Foliat near Hungerford, midway between London and the Somerset home of Bron’s parents, Combe Florey.

Although his father would later tell him that his grandfather had been “pathetically pleased and proud to have a grandson”, Alexander had no memory of Evelyn Waugh, who died on Easter Day 1966, aged 62.

Evelyn’s widow Laura subsequently put Combe Florey on the market, but as Alexander recalled in Fathers and Sons, “when prospective buyers came round she poured buckets of water through the floorboards and ordered her dog, Credit, to shit on the carpets and pee against the curtains. If anyone was brazen enough to put in an offer after that, she declined it.”

Successful in her failure to sell Combe Florey, in 1971 Laura Waugh moved across to the North Wing so that Bron and his family could move into the main house. Alexander was close to his grandmother, sharing among other things her fondness for cows, which, “on good days when they escaped through holes in the wire”, he was allowed to chase through the woods, waving laurel branches and shouting at them in a Somerset accent.

After she died in 1973 he was left with an abiding memory of the smell that attached to all her jerseys – “sherry, French cigarettes and dog baskets all blended into one, a lovely Granny fragrance”.

With his father, whom he adored, he had a far happier relationship than Bron did with Evelyn Waugh, although Bron was never “a conventional parent in the Hollywood or BBC sense”, Alexander wrote. “He never kicked a football around the garden, never played Frisbee, never took me camping
 He was, above all a literary man, but he did nothing to inspire in me a love of books. He never read aloud, never suggested titles I might enjoy.”

Bron had hated his time at Downside, and Alexander went instead as a day boy to Taunton School, where he got into frequent trouble, following his father’s nonconformist lead. On one occasion, conceiving the notion that a maths teacher was guilty of hiding women’s underwear in a locked cupboard in his classroom and unable to force open the doors, Waugh threw the cupboard down a flight of the stairs “in an effort to break it open and reveal his dirty secret”. For this he was rusticated, although Bron took the view that his son had for once shown bravery, skill and enterprise, and wrote to the headmaster recommending that he be awarded school colours for his actions.

Having failed his interview to New College, Oxford, Waugh read music at Manchester University, feeling a “deep sense of shame at being the first Waugh in four generations to fail his Oxford entrance”. After graduating, he began submitting cartoon strips to the Literary Review, where his father had become editor in 1986, and later to The Daily Telegraph.

Reluctant to follow in the family’s literary footsteps, for the next few years Waugh worked as a record producer, composer, concert agent and classical impresario.

In 1991 he entered a competition that led to his appointment as opera critic on The Mail on Sunday, where he gained a reputation for cheerful iconoclasm. Within a year, he had followed the editor Stewart Steven to the more influential post of opera critic on the Evening Standard. “Congratulations,” said Bron. “You have the job that every middle-aged poofter in London is dying for, and you have it for life.”

Sacked after four years by Max Hastings when he succeeded Steven as editor, in 1996 Waugh and his brother Nat won the Vivien Ellis Prize for Best New Musical with a black comedy farce called Bon Voyage! which was later staged at Notting Hill Gate.

He launched the Travelman publishing company, selling short stories on a single sheet that folded up like a map and sold for £1 at Underground stations, wrote TV reviews for the Telegraph and began work on his first book, Time: From Microseconds to Millennia (1999), which Patrick Moore hailed on its publication as “outstandingly successful”.

When Bron Waugh died in 2001, Polly Toynbee wrote a bitter valedictory for The Guardian headlined “Ghastly Man”, which appeared alongside a cartoon showing the columnist’s corpse being washed down a lavatory.

His son responded that the family had no intention of compounding the “mighty damage” which, according to Toynbee, the Waugh “clan” had already done to the country, “by disposing of his body in this unhygienic manner”, adding that “we shall ensure that all health and safety regulations are observed when the great man is buried in Somerset on Wednesday.”

By that time, Alexander had almost finished his second book, God: The Biography (2002), the prospect of which had prompted Bron, for reasons never explained to his son, to offer him the sum of his advance not to publish it.

When the book did appear, although some critics took issue with the author’s apparent preference for entertaining his readers over establishing “truths”, it was commended by Jeanette Winterson as “a deeply felt and genuine exploration
 a search for love”, and by Christopher Hitchens as a “sparkling atheist polemic” – although Waugh identified as a Hermetist and Tolstovian Christian anarchist rather than atheist.

It was his father’s death that led Waugh to investigate the father-son relationships over five generations of his family, and Sir Vidia Naipaul encouraged him to make this the subject of his next book.

The resulting Fathers and Sons was described by Selina Hastings in the Literary Review as “exceptional for its honesty, intuitiveness, humour and for the beguiling individuality of its author’s voice”. It was “an extraordinarily fascinating study”, she added, in which Waugh used “his familiarity to great purpose, bringing to his reading of letters, diaries and published works a powerful intelligence and an almost extrasensory perceptiveness”.

Waugh’s next book, The House of Wittgenstein: A Family at War (2009), was acclaimed in The Independent as “a sharp combination of some formidable scholarship
 with a wonderful eye for absurdity”.

Over the next decade, much of Waugh’s time was devoted to his role as general editor of the OUP’s multi-volume edition of Evelyn Waugh’s complete works, the first volumes of which appeared in 2017. He also became increasingly busy in his quest to prove that William Shakespeare was a nom de plume used by the courtier peer Edward de Vere. His YouTube videos on the subject received more than a million views.

“The Stratfordians have been trying to pretend we don’t exist for a long time, but now they’re running scared,” Waugh said in 2014. “As Mahatma Gandhi said, ‘First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, and then you win.’ We’ve got to the fight bit.”

When he took out a full-page advertisement in The Times Literary Supplement offering to donate £40,000 to the Shakespeare Birthplace Trust if it could establish Shakespeare’s authorship beyond reasonable doubt in open, public debate, the Trust’s president, Sir Stanley Wells, declined and accused Waugh of conducting a campaign against them, calling him a “wicked” and “evil” man, and refusing to have dinner in the same room as him.

Other Shakespeare dons suggested that Waugh’s argument rested on snobbery, Sir Jonathan Bate quipping in a debate against Waugh that his family had always loved the aristocracy, little knowing that Waugh was in fact a descendant of the Earl of Oxford’s via his grandmother Laura (nĂ©e Herbert).

Waugh did not shout about this link, explaining to the American writer Elizabeth Winkler when she was researching her book Shakespeare Was a Woman and Other Heresies (2023) his fear that the Stratfordians would only use it to claim that he was merely advocating for his ancestor.

In any case, he said, he was related to several of the other authorship candidates as well: “Francis Bacon is a great-uncle. I’m directly descended from Mary Sidney [and] Henry Neville. So I’ve got a choice, OK?” he told Winkler.

“If they were that confident [that Shakespeare was not a pseudonym],” he added, “there’d be absolutely no need to be rude and abusive and silly. Every one of their reactions is a sign that they know they’re on weak ground.”

Waugh’s other books included Classical Music: A New Way of Listening (1995); Shakespeare in Court (2014), and (as co-editor) Shakespeare Beyond Doubt? (2016), a collection of essays.

He had recently completed a three-volume 1,500-page scholarly work of reference entitled The New Shakespeare Allusion Book, co-written with Dr Roger Stritmatter.

For many years, Waugh acted as the reliably funny host of the Literary Review’s Bad Sex Award, established by his father to honour the year’s “most outstandingly awful scene of sexual description in an otherwise good novel”. He was later a visiting Fellow at the University of Leicester.

Waugh was always learning new pieces on the piano, and mastered Godowsky’s complex pieces for the left hand while researching his Wittgenstein book. He wrote and  presented a documentary for BBC Four called the Piano: A Love Affair, and in his final months enjoyed listening to pieces by Purcell, Bach and Boyce.

For friends and visiting researchers, he was warm, generous and engaging, with, as Elizabeth Winkler observed, “an impish, amused expression as though a smirk is always twitching at the corners of his mouth”, his “hair flying up wildly around a bald crown like an electrocuted scientist” and his clothes “wrinkled and dishevelled in the manner of a man too immersed in Renaissance literature to bother with appearances”.

He loved to play with ideas and was always in search of the next joke. Children loved him for being lively and liberal, interested and interesting.

He responded to his prostate cancer diagnosis a year ago with characteristic good humour and continued to tell  jokes until two days before before he died.

Waugh married, in 1990, Eliza Chancellor, daughter of Bron’s great friend Alexander Chancellor, who survives him with their two daughters, Mary and Sally, and son, Bron.

Alexander Waugh, born December 30 1963, died July 22 2024

Many thanks to reader Dave Lull for providing a copy of the obituary.

Share
Posted in Alexander Waugh, Newspapers, Obituaries | 4 Comments

Mid-July Roundup

–British author, commentator and journalist Gerald Warner has posted an article entitled “Evelyn Waugh and Anthony Powell–visions of a vanished Britain.” In this he compares the lives and writings of the two authors who were also friends in real life. Here are the opening paragraphs:

There is an instinct shared by writers, critics and readers to select two authors whose lives and works present an evident congruence and yoke them together in a symbiotic relationship that often becomes permanent in public perception. This tendency extends beyond writers coupled by collaboration, such as Addison and Steele or Somerville and Ross, to authors who worked independently, but whose oeuvre and, sometimes, biographies suggest an affinity. Exceptionally, this association can reach across centuries, languages and cultures, where one author’s work is derivative from another, as in the case of Virgil and Homer.

English literature supplies several instances of the twinning of writers. Keats and Shelley, as paradigms of the Romantic poets, are obvious examples; likewise, to a lesser extent, Dickens and Thackeray, or Disraeli and Bulwer Lytton. In the niche market of pseudo-Catholic kitsch, one might similarly combine Frederick Rolfe, Baron Corvo with Ronald Firbank. George Bernard Shaw took the concept to its ultimate conclusion by merging GK Chesterton and Hilaire Belloc, to confect the pantomime-horse identity of ‘Chesterbelloc’.

The two 20th century authors who offer the most credible prospect for creating a literary symbiosis are Evelyn Waugh and Anthony Powell. The two men, though distinct in their inspiration and style, had a remarkable amount in common…

The discussions and comparisons of their work are well written, entertaining and accurate. After considering the works of both authors, Warner is inclined to think Waugh’s is the better, based on his incorporation of religious themes into his postwar work, a theme Powell stays well clear of.  One could, as I do, come to exactly the opposite conclusion, so it is a matter on which reasonable minds can differ. But that does not make Warner’s essay any less worthwhile, and it is highly recommended. It is posted on the website Engelsberg Ideas. Here’s the link.

–The journal Foreign Policy strays into literature in its latest issue where it offers a review of the recent State-of-Britain novel Caledonian Road. The novel is written by Andrew O’Hagan and is reviewed by Nicholas Lezard. The review opens with this:

Many years ago, I heard a well-known English novelist refer to Andrew O’Hagan, somewhat disparagingly, as “Andrew O’Tolstoy.” He was making a point about O’Hagan’s seriousness. At the time, O’Hagan was much better known as a critic and nonfiction writer for the London Review of Books. But it popped into my head again when I saw the very first thing in his new novel, Caledonian Road: a cast of characters…

Having just recently finished reading the book, I was immediately hooked because I had noticed the same list and was put on guard that it seemed a very long one even for a book extending over 600 plus pages. Indeed, without that list it is doubtful that I would have fought my way through the book’s description of the dozens of characters who wander through its pages.  Lezard makes several points about the book with which I found myself in agreement. He also inserted this reference to some rather surprising allusions to Evelyn Waugh which I had also noted:

…The Catholicism (there are also Polish Catholics here) reminds me of Evelyn Waugh, the class- and faith-obsessed British author I think it’s meant to, for Waugh is referred to by name and work a couple of times, and the book echoes the frenzied hedonism of Vile Bodies and the stately homes of Brideshead

Lezard’s opinions about the book are thoughtful and well-presented. I am glad to have read the book given its timeliness in the wake of the General Election. Whether or not I enjoyed reading it is another matter but Lezard’s review helps me understand why I it reacted to it  in much the same way he did. Here’s a link.

–The website Bridgeman Images has posted a photograph which may be of interest to Waugh fans. This is described as follows: “Photograph of Alistair Graham naked, kept with his letter to Evelyn Waugh, c.1924 (gelatin silver print).”  The letter and photograph are deposited at the British Library with the remainder of their archive of Waugh’s correspondence.

–The Jesuit journal America has an article by Terrance Klein entitled “A lesson on the Eucharist from ‘Brideshead Revisited‘”. It offers several relevant quotes from Waugh’s novel for the consideration of those attending the Eucharistic Congress convened this month in Indianapolis.

–The Daily Telegraph has a story dated 19 July 2024 entitled: “Why London has the worst traffic in Europe.” This is by Nicholas Boys Smith and opens with an historic review of London traffic. In this he includes a quote from Evelyn Waugh relating to what it was like in the 1930s:

…In early 20th-century London, the horses morphed into motorcars, but the traffic remained. In his 1938 novel, Scoop, Evelyn Waugh satirised Piccadilly’s “stationary” traffic, “continuous and motionless, still as a photograph, unbroken and undisturbed” so “terrible” that the wife of the cabinet minister, Algernon Stitch, was regularly obliged to drive along kerbs in her tiny “baby car” until she was booked and ordered back onto the road by a policeman: “Third time this week,” said Mrs Stitch. “I wish they wouldn’t. It’s such a nuisance for Algy.”…

Share
Posted in Brideshead Revisited, Newspapers, Photographs, Scoop, Vile Bodies | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Roundup: An Election, a Film and a Lost Masterpiece.

The Sunday Times has a story (7 July) in which Will Lloyd considers whether the recent election has brought social mobility back to the the British government and ended the domination of the “posh boys” who were the leaders of the Blair and Cameron regimes. How the posh boys had become established is part of the story, and Evelyn Waugh makes a contribution. Here’e an excerpt:

…Waiting for the Etonians was the title of a book from 2009 by the left-wing columnist Nick Cohen, anticipating the Cameron government. This comeback “was the weirdest thing”, says the historian David Kynaston. “The working assumption everyone had was that the old Etonians would never come back, an assumption compounded by Margaret Thatcher, with her grocer’s daughter from Grantham stuff.”

With its turn towards cuddly, hug-ahoodie, socially liberal conservatism, the ancient British ruling class had reinvented itself for the 21st century. Kynaston, the author of several acclaimed histories of postwar Britain, compares hearing Cameron’s voice on the radio in the 2010s to hearing the voices of upper-class Tories such as Anthony Eden (Eton), Harold Macmillan (Eton) and Douglas-Home (Eton) on the radio when he was a child. He quotes Evelyn Waugh’s Brideshead Revisited, in which one character warns the protagonist Charles Ryder that charm is “the great English blight. It does not exist outside these damp islands. It spots and kills anything it touches.” That, argued Kynaston, was “at the heart of Cameron”.

The posh renaissance of the early 2010s was not confined to politics. The tawdry celeb culture of the Noughties gave way to a near-Edwardian opulence. Millions of people, some probably even descended from big-house servants, enjoyed watching Downton Abbey every Sunday night on ITV. Aspirationally posh, jolly boarding school types, from Nigella Lawson to Clare Balding, Boris Johnson to Hugh Fearnley-Whittingstall, filled our television schedules. Brideshead was revisited once more in a 2008 film adaptation starring the Downton stud Matthew Goode…

The path for this elite comeback was paved by Tony Blair, who declared the class war “over” in 1999. Globalisation, access to university education, and social benefits skimmed from taxes on the City were supposed to result in a classless New Labour Britain. Cameron then sought to convince the country that he was the heir to Blair and ordinary enough to be its leader, deploying bromides such as “it’s where you’re going to, not where you’re from, that counts”. Tory MP Nadine Dorries, however, derided him and Osborne as “posh boys” ? a term she later applied to Rishi Sunak…

The Tatler has a feature length article on the Mitford sisters which opens with a description of a film mentioned in a recent post and based on their own lives rather than on those of the characters they had created in their writings. Here’s the opening:

The article is by Clara Strurick and can be read in full at this link.

–The religious website Aleteia has a discussion of Waugh’s novel Helena. The article is by Suzanne M Wolfe and begins with this:

The 20th-century British novelist and Catholic convert Evelyn Waugh (1903-1966) is known primarily for his biting, funny, and profoundly satirical novels. One famous exception, of course, was the romantic saga set between the world wars, Brideshead Revisited (though along with the drama it still contained a share of social satire).

When he published his novel Helena in 1950, however, many of his readers were taken aback. Unlike Brideshead and his satires of modern life, here is a book set in the ancient world. It chronicles the life of St. Helena, mother of the Roman Emperor Constantine, and discoverer of the True Cross of Christ.

What is it about this relatively obscure Catholic saint that induced Waugh to attempt a very different sort of novel — one that he took great pride in?…

An interesting illustrated discussion follows and can be seen and read here.

The Oldie has posted an article in which art critic and biographer Mirabel Cecil has described what was thought to be Rex Whistler’s lost masterpiece. In the article she goes on to describe the painting “Ulysses’s Farewll to Penelope” and, based on a recent discovery, updates this as well some other matters that appeared in her 2012 book written jointly with her husband Hugh. Waugh and Whistler were friends although not close. She mentions Waugh briefly in the article in the context of her critique of the treatment of Whistler’s works in one of the museums where it is displayed:

…The hang is only part of the problem. The caption is in equally poor taste as well as being pretty useless. Instead of explaining who Rex actually was, his dates, or how this self-portrait has come to be here, it states only that he was the model for the painter Charles Ryder in Brideshead Revisited. This is not even proven, although the museum’s caption presents it as fact.

The only record we have of Evelyn Waugh on Rex is in a letter Waugh wrote to their mutual friend Lady Diana Cooper:

‘I barely knew Rex Whistler. How I love him for asking, “What has victory to do with it?” It was the question one longed to hear asked in the last years of the war and not hearing it made me morose. It is the theme of my own little trilogy.’ (Waugh refers to his Sword of Honour war trilogy, and not to Brideshead Revisited.)

Waugh wrote this years after the war; but it shows his contemporaries’ admiration for Rex. Waugh, Diana Cooper, Cecil Beaton
 they all loved him for who he was. And they respected him for the brave decision he made in giving up his successful career and enlisting in order to fight the Nazi tyranny…

The article is quite interesting and can be read in full at this link.

 

 

 

Share
Posted in Art, Photography & Sculpture, Brideshead Revisited, Film, Helena, Newspapers, Sword of Honour | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Evelyn Waugh Studies 54.3 (Winter 2023) Posted

The latest volume of the Society’s thrice yearly journal Evelyn Waugh Studies,  No. 54.3 (Winter 2023) has been posted. Here is a description of its contents by the Society’s Secretary, Jamie Collinson:

This edition features a brilliant essay by Tim Nau on the names Waugh gave his characters. I think this is an underrated element of Waugh’s comic genius, and Nau – as Canada’s foremost expert on names – is ideally placed to bring it to light.

The edition also features Jeffrey Manley’s review of Modernism and the Aristocracy: Monsters of English Privilege, by Adam Parkes. This well-presented book takes a look at the impact of World War 1 and modernism on the lives of the English aristocracy, so of course features much discussion of Waugh’s work.

The journal is available at this link.

Share
Posted in Articles, Books about Evelyn Waugh, Evelyn Waugh Society, Evelyn Waugh Studies, Journal | Leave a comment

Evelyn Waugh and the Cancel Culture

–Simon Heffer has written a brief but interesting and amusing article about what he fears would be the attitude of today’s “Cancel Culture” to Evelyn Waugh first novel, Decline and Fall. This appeared in a recent issue of the Daily Telegraph and was reposted on other sites. It is entitled “Cancel Evelyn Waugh? We’d censor one of Britain’s sharpest critics”.  Here is the text as reposted:

I try to ignore the so-called culture wars, trusting Telegraph readers to dismiss the censoriousness of those who would prevent us from seeing, or hearing, or reading things they deem offensive. We all know that times, attitudes and language change: even a few decades ago, writers, filmmakers or artists who wished to shock would do so in ways that seem mild today.

Equally, things that once were considered unshocking – notably concerning minorities, attitudes towards women and ideas of sexuality – are now judged by the self-declared authorities to be too offensive.

I hope this is but a passing phase; if not, all sorts of insights will be lost to us. In the 1970s, an exemplary schoolmaster gave me a copy of Evelyn Waugh’s first novel, Decline and Fall. I was 16 years old, read it in one sitting, and revelled in it: I was just grown-up enough not only to get the jokes, but to admire their darkness, Waugh’s flawless command of English and the mixture of subtlety and brazenness with which he obtained his comic effects. He was 24 when he wrote it and it is a young man’s book – but none the worse for that.

Yet were a 16-year-old, or indeed any student, to be taught the book today, they would doubtless be warned about what one reviewer on Amazon calls “a few dated racist descriptions” – “the N-word” is liberally used – or else the teacher could find themselves in trouble.

The novel still sells in huge numbers and one hopes its readers recognise it as satire. Its target is largely the only people one can safely ridicule today: the overprivileged, white upper-middle classes. The plot concerns a hapless Oxford undergraduate who by accident and through his own naivety ends up in prison, via a Welsh prep school staffed by sadists, paedophiles and charlatans. In the age of the misery memoir, such an establishment can certainly not be considered amusing. Indeed, any reader of Waugh’s contemporary George Orwell will know such places were not works of the imagination. Captain Grimes – the chief molester – was based on a schoolmaster with whom Waugh worked.

Most shocking in 1928, when the novel appeared, would have been a scene in which one boy’s mother arrives for his sports day with an “irreproachably dressed” black man who is not her husband. Today, no one could care less. However, when he meets the abominable Lady Circumference (whose son dies of wounds from an ill-directed starting pistol), he speaks of racial prejudice, remarking that what white people think best for the black man is to “beat him; put him in chains; load him with burdens”.

Waugh notes this provokes a “responsive glitter in Lady Circumference’s eye”. The vicar then says: “The mistake was ever giving them their freedom. They were far happier and better looked-after before.” No one can seriously believe Waugh ever held this view about slavery. It is obvious he is trying to show what a completely ghastly woman Lady Circumference was, and skewer the Church, too. Inevitably, in 2017, when the BBC made a typically unfunny adaptation of the book, these observations were clearly deemed too dangerous to include, in case anyone took them seriously, or thought the vicar was right.

They also omitted what I have always considered the most hilarious passage in the book, a diatribe by the atrocious headmaster of the school, Dr Fagan, against the Welsh. Seldom has there been such a display of English bigotry, or has an Englishman sounded more pompous. He rants: “From the earliest times the Welsh have been looked upon as an unclean people. It is thus that they have preserved their racial integrity. Their sons and daughters rarely mate with human-kind except their own blood relations
[they] are the only nation in the world that has produced no graphic or plastic art, no architecture, no drama. They just sing.” Funniest of all is when he says he has considered publishing on the subject, “but I was afraid it might make me unpopular in the village”.

People are shocking, and many novels reflect this. Waugh was a genius at presenting their horror. He must never be cancelled nor censored, because we need him to confront us with all that is worst in the world.

As I recall, the BBC’s 2017 adaptation of Decline and Fall was deemed to be quite funny and was well received, even if some of the more lurid passages were deleted. The deletions did not change the story. Heffer is to be thanked for reminding us of the deleted passages but so should we also be thankful for the BBC’s adaptation which, as these things go, was quite close to the original. The description of the Welsh still retains its humor but the vicar’s comments on slavery would require a careful bit of script writing and acting to evoke many laughs. It probably is better read than performed. But neither scene should ever be deleted from printed editions, even those intended for educational purposes, which I think is a point Heffer makes very well. Better not to publish “woke” editions at all even if that were to keep the book out of “woke” syllabuses.

Share
Posted in Adaptations, Decline and Fall, Humo(u)r, Newspapers, Television | Tagged , | Leave a comment

General Election Roundup

The Oldie has posted an article by A N Wilson commenting on elections with particular reference to the one scheduled for next week in the UK. Here’s an excerpt where he is reminded of Evelyn Waugh’s position on that subject:

…It’s years since I voted in [a general election]. This is partly because I so much enjoy Evelyn Waugh’s joke answer when he was asked how he would be voting: ‘I do not aspire to advise my sovereign in her choice of servants.’

Joke answer? Well, semi-joke. Waugh probably believed – as I do, more and more – that voting makes very little difference. In so far as it makes a difference, it makes things worse by encouraging the obvious falsehood that government by parties, to which very few people belong, is the most ‘democratic’ form of government.

Most of us loathe the parties, and despise them for drawing up ‘manifestos’ of what they pretend they believe. Such an exercise made sense for Marx and Engels writing The Communist Manifesto, which in its way is a rather splendid document. But this was a dream-aspiration, not a lying blueprint for government…

Here’s a link to the article.

The Oldie has also posted a retrospective essay by Mark McGinness marking the death of Nancy Mitford on 30 June 1973 in Paris. It’s a bit past the anniversary date but worth posting nonetheless. Here are the opening paragraphs:

…[Her death] was a little like The Pursuit of Love after Linda Radlett’s death, “for us at Alconleigh
 a light went out, a great deal of joy that never could be replaced.”

Nancy’s anniversary coincides with the announcement that her life and that of her sisters is to be dramatised in a six-part television series entitled Outrageous, written by Sarah Williams, based on Mary Lovell’s biography, The Mitford Girls (2001), and produced by Firebird Productions, a BBC Studio label. Nancy is being played by Bessie Carter, daughter of Dame Imelda Staunton and Jim Carter and (who recently starred – and will again – upstairs and down – as Downton’s Lady Bagshaw and Carson). Debo, Duchess of Devonshire, was a great admirer of Mary Lovell and once described her as “a terrier for research” so one can have high hopes for the script. The sisters’ lives made good copy with more than their share of high drama and tragedy – especially Nancy.

She began to suffer pain in her left leg at the end of 1968 and despite countless consultations, Hodgkin’s disease was not diagnosed until 1972. It was an agonising four years, made worse by an announcement in the Figaro one morning in March 1969, that the love of her life, Gaston Palewski, her Sauveterre and Charles-Edouard du Valhubert, and by then President of the Constitutional Council of France, had married Violette de Talleyrand- PĂ©rigord duchesse de Sagan

The full article can be read at this link.

–The Guardian has a review by Rosalind Jana of an exhibit at Chatsworth House where Nancy Mitford’s youngest sister Deborah lived as Duchess of Devonshire. Here’s a description:

This summer, Chatsworth hosts Erdem: Imaginary Conversations, an exhibition exploring the influence of the late Deborah Cavendish, nee Mitford, former inhabitant and muse for the designer’s spring/summer 24 collection. Showcasing deconstructed ballgowns and bejewelled insects, the opening look is the funniest, a fraying tweed skirt-suit alluding to the Duchess’s love of derbyshire redcaps and Scots dumpies. Erdem says he wanted it to look “ravaged by chickens”.

The review goes on to describe how the exhibit reflects the cult of the country house:

…[L]ook closer and Debo emerges as the poster girl for the still-influential interwar fiction of a ruling class on the brink of disappearance; their roofs and cardigans both full of holes, the old world in decline while the heating bills rise. This palatably decaying image, complete with tulle skirts in storage and an endless supply of valuable artwork and tapestries to be sold off in an emergency, lights up a weird nostalgia-synapse in the British psyche. It is the same part tickled by endless Brideshead Revisited and The Pursuit of Love remakes, in which the dream of the big house is counterbalanced by more relatable problems: chilblains, melancholy, emotional distance, the threat of obsolescence. But it’s worth remembering that in Debo’s case, the grand narrative is not one of triumph against the odds or any real threat of hardship, but something more akin to a princess who got to keep the palace…

The article concludes:

…In 1959, Evelyn Waugh wrote in an updated introduction to Brideshead Revisited, published 15 years previously, that it was “a panegyric preached over an empty coffin,” observing that “Brideshead today would be open to trippers, its treasures rearranged by expert hands and the fabric better maintained than it was by Lord Marchmain.”

The “cult of the country house” he identified then remains strong – Chatsworth is still monumentally popular, and Erdem’s exhibition will undoubtedly be a hit – but stronger still is the status of the aristocracy. Debo’s son Peregrine, the current duke of Devonshire, has an estimated net worth of £910m, occupying number 182 on this year’s Sunday Times rich list. This is unsurprising, given that it follows a general trend of extraordinary wealth consolidation among Britain’s peers via land ownership, asset management schemes, investments and more.

We might now be allowed to nose inside their grand halls and even take great pleasure in their frocks, but it is worth remembering that the aristocracy are not mere relics or enjoyably spirited stock characters – but active participants in a vastly unequal landscape.

Here’s a link to the full review.

–OUP has announced the American release of its new edition of The Loved One (CWEW v. 10) on 23 July 2024. It was released three months ago in Europe. The US price is $170, and it is available from Amazon.com at this link. See previous post for details.

UPDATE (2 July 2024; 5 July 2024): Mark McGinness kindly sent the following comment: “The 80th anniversary of the publication of Nancy’s Pursuit in fact falls on 10 December next year – just seven months after Brideshead. We look forward to them both being revived and celebrated.” This was the anniversary to which he referred, not her death in 1973. The text of the article has been modified accordingly. Many thanks.

 

Share
Posted in Art, Photography & Sculpture, Brideshead Revisited, Complete Works, Newspapers, The Loved One | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Roundup: Two Letters and a Vase

The Spectator has an article by Dot Wordsworth that features a misattribution to Evelyn Waugh. Here’s the opening:

‘Evelyn Waugh,’ said my husband when I asked who came up with the analogy of carrying a Ming vase. He was, in a way, right, but wrong too.

Every political commentator, it seems, has been talking of Sir Keir Starmer’s Ming vase strategy in approaching the election. In April 2021 Decca Aitkenhead was reminded of Roy Jenkins’s observation that before the 1997 election: ‘Tony Blair took such care not to make any mistakes, he resembled “a man carrying a priceless Ming vase across a highly polished floor”.’ Indeed, Ben Macintyre had cited Jenkins on 4 July 1996 – 28 years exactly before Keir Day…

After several other examples of the “Ming vase” analogy, the article concludes with this:

…This leads back to my husband’s misremembered remark by Evelyn Waugh. In 1951, Waugh reviewed Stephen Spender’s World Within World and said: ‘To see him fumbling with our rich and delicate language is to experience all the horror of seeing a SĂšvres vase in the hands of a chimpanzee.’

The Guardian has posted an interview of novelist Irvine Welsh that includes this:

The book that made me want to be a writer
Men at Arms by Evelyn Waugh, or all of what has come to be known as “the Guy Crouchback Trilogy”. Waugh writes beautifully about the rivalry and loyalty between men. I remember being on a long flight with Auberon Waugh to Australia, telling him about his father’s influence on my work. It probably wasn’t what he wanted to hear – come to think of it, he died shortly after this.

–Sotheby’s has announced the upcoming auction of two letters of Evelyn Waugh from  October and November 1939 in which he requests consideration of an appointment to the Navy or Royal Marines. One is addressed to Winston Churchill (as First Lord of the Admiralty) and the other has no addressee. Here’s their description:

Two autograph letters signed:

i) To Winston Churchill, as First Lord of the Admiralty, asking if “you have any use for me in the Navy, in intelligence, public relations, or any other department?”, 1 page, 8vo, headed stationery of Pixton Park, Dulverton, 10 October [1939], punch holes and pin holes

ii) To “Dear Sir”, asking for his support in Waugh’s request for a commission in the Royal Marines, explaining that Churchill has “strongly recommended” him, and outlining his credentials, 2 pages, 4to, “as from Pixton Park, Dulverton”, 7 November [1939], punch hole and pin holes

“
I was 36 a few days ago and can honestly say that I am fitter physically than I was ten years ago. I am a writer by profession but most of my leisure has been spent in travel, most of it of a strenuous kind. I have equipped & led small caravans in Abyssinia & South America and have been on a sledging expedition in Spitzbergen. I had an undistinguished career in the OTC at Lancing, ending as a lance corporal. After that I went to Hartford, [sic] Oxford and took a third in history. I have been a newspaper correspondent in various parts of the world. My knowledge of foreign languages is, alas, negligible
”

Evelyn Waugh was determined to serve his country following the outbreak of war with Nazi Germany in September 1939. His initial approaches to the War Office, naval intelligence, and the Welsh Guards were, however, rejected. Both Churchill and Brendan Bracken supported his request for a commission in the Royal Marines, which he received in November 1939. He found military service frustrating and dispiriting, but it provided the raw material for the Sword of Honour trilogy.

Aside from announcing that the auction opens on 26 June 2024, the details require registration to access. There is no indication of the origin of the  letters or who may have been the previous owner(s). The internet listing includes a partial copy of the originals of both letters. I think it unlikely that Waugh mispelled the name of his college at Oxford, but that portion of the letter is not visible.  Here’s a link.

–The New York Times has a review of a novel by Rosiland Brown entitled Practice. Here are the opening paragraphs:

A novel that is mostly about the deskbound drama of study: The heart quickens, no? Not for all readers, I suppose. In search of larger stakes, novels of student life have generally scanted the slow labor of scholarship as such, or the reckless midnight dash to the term-paper deadline.

Instead, as in Evelyn Waugh’s “Brideshead Revisited,” university may involve champagne, plovers’ eggs and the “low door in the wall” to gilded love and disappointment. Or more sober lessons about sex and capital — as in the novels of Sally Rooney. “We read in order to come to life,” says the narrator of Claire-Louise Bennett’s “Checkout 19.” It is hard to think, however, of a novel that describes as precisely as Rosalind Brown’s “Practice” does what happens when an ardent young person sits down to read and learn and write…

The review is by Brian Dillon. Here’s a link.

 

 

Share
Posted in Auctions, Brideshead Revisited, Interviews, Letters, Men at Arms, Newspapers, Oxford, World War II | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Waugh + Greene = “The Odd Couple”

The Critic magazine has posted a feature length article by literary critic and biographer Jeffrey Meyers. This is entitled “The odd couple: Evelyn Waugh and Graham Greene may have been unlike as possible, but they remained the closest of friends for four decades.” The article opens with this:

Evelyn Waugh and Graham Greene had one of the great modern literary friendships — comparable to Conrad and Ford, Eliot and Pound, Owen and Sassoon. Strikingly similar in many ways, they were close contemporaries and came from professional middle-class families. Waugh’s father was a publisher, Greene’s father a headmaster.

Both had successful brothers: the older Alec Waugh was a popular novelist; the younger Sir Hugh Greene was Director-General of the BBC. Waugh and Greene went from minor public schools, Lancing and Berkhamsted, to Oxford — Greene to Balliol, Waugh to the less distinguished Hertford College — where they were acquainted but not close since (as Waugh claimed) Greene “looked down on us as childish and ostentatious. He certainly shared in none of our revelry”.

Both men had an unhappy marriage. Greene left his wife and children in 1939 but remained married, which allowed him the freedom to have many affairs without the risk of a permanent connection. (His long-time lovers, Catherine Walston and Yvonne Cloetta, were also married.) Betrayed by his first wife whom he divorced, Waugh had seven children with his second wife and was a severe and distant pĂšre de famille. Both men travelled widely and were temperamentally pugnacious.

Both men were Catholic converts in the late 1920s, but for different reasons. Greene converted in order to marry a devout Catholic. Waugh sought solace in the Church after being deeply wounded by his first wife’s adultery. A religious conservative and political reactionary, Waugh supported the Italian invasion of Ethiopia and Franco’s fascists in the Spanish Civil War. Greene, resolutely left-wing, befriended the revolutionary dictators Fidel Castro and Omar Torrijos of Panama…

After then describing several ways in which they differ, Meyers engages in a fascinating and detailed discussion of their relations with each other as writers and friends from the mid 1930s until Waugh’s death in 1966. Included are extended public and private debates of their works, especially in the case of two of Greene’s novels–The End of the Affair and The Heart of the Matter. Meyer’s essay appears to be an attempt at producing the definitive written consideration of this relationship. From what I know, it appears to be successful. It is accurate, fully supported with relevant quotes and reads well. After an extended discussion of their different approaches to the Roman Catholic Church, the article concludes with this:

…Waugh called Greene “the greatest novelist of the century”. When Waugh died in April 1966, Greene told his widow, “As a writer I admired him more than any other living novelist, & as a man I loved him. He was a very loyal & patient friend to me.” In Ways of Escape, he mourned “the death not only of a writer whom I had admired ever since the twenties, but of a friend” and noted his literary and religious qualities: “There was always in Evelyn a conflict between the satirist and the romantic 
 He had too great expectations even of his Church.” Despite Waugh’s reputation for rudeness and cruelty, Greene thought he was privately generous and physically courageous in war.

Waugh envied his friend’s good looks, glamorous lover, considerable wealth, freedom from domestic ties and connection to powerful leaders; Greene tolerated Waugh’s doctrinaire criticism and bad behaviour. Their friendship was sustained by their deep emotional affinity; worldly experience, common interests and stimulating talks; respect for each other’s intelligence, perception and judgement; understanding of their struggles and admiration for their books. Their bond was strong enough to survive their political and religious crevasse, and their extraordinary friendship survived without a serious quarrel to the very end.

Waugh had similar long lasting professional/personal friendships with, for example, writers Anthony Powell and Nancy Mitford, as well as friendships and correspondences with socially and intellectually prominent women Diana Cooper and Ann Fleming. That does not seem to have been the case with Greene but is perhaps beyond the scope of Meyers’ essay.  The Critic has posted both a full text with illustrations and a 24-minute audio version. Here’s a link. Enjoy.

 

 

Share
Posted in Articles, Newspapers | Tagged , , | Leave a comment