Waugh in Djibouti

The Daily Beast, an internet newspaper that it owes its title to Waugh, has run a background article on the small east African nation of Djibouti. Their correspondent Tim Mak made a trip to the country which is now host to armies from seven countries with sometimes competing interests in the area. This includes the U.S., Japan and China, as well as France which was the colonial power at the time of Waugh’s 1930s visit when it was called French Somaliland.

Mak reports, inter alia,  on the desolation of the city of Djibouti whose spookily empty streets, even at midday, remind him of Waugh’s description:

It’s 2:30 p.m. in downtown Djibouti, and it is a ghost town. The streets are deserted, even along the main roads leading to the city center. In the 1930s, when novelist Evelyn Waugh toured what was then known as French Somaliland, he bemoaned the area’s “intolerable desolation,” calling it a “country of dust and boulders, utterly devoid of any sign of life.” … Eighty-five years after Waugh’s remarks, the streets of the capital clear almost every afternoon. The heat is so incredibly intense that the workday starts and ends early, and then much of the population heads home to chew khat, a leafy plant that is engrained in local culture but banned in most of the West.

The quote from Waugh appears in his book Remote People (1931, p. 23, in the U.S. entitled They Still Were Dancing). Waugh passed through the country on his way to Abyssinia via the railroad that extended from the port at Djibouti to Addis Ababa.

Share
Posted in Remote People | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Waugh in Djibouti

Date Announced for New Waugh Biography

The Daily Telegraph has announced the 31 March publication date for a new biography of Waugh:

March 31: Evelyn Waugh: A Life Revisited, by Philip Eade (Books)

There has been no full-length biography of Evelyn Waugh for 20 years. Ahead of the 50th anniversary of his death in April, Eade’s account asks how far the novelist hid his own experiences in his fiction.

The book, to be published by Weidenfield & Nicolson, is among the important cultural events noted by the Telegraph for the first quarter of 2016. Advance orders may be placed on Amazon at the link to the title above. According to Amazon’s description of the book (to which the publishers no doubt contributed):

Eade offers a more contemporary view than previous biographies, explaining why Waugh’s work continues to grow in popularity. It takes account of the most recent Waugh scholarship and makes use of extensive unseen primary sources that cast new light on many of the key phases and themes of Waugh’s life…

Share
Posted in Anniversaries, Biographies, Books about Evelyn Waugh | Tagged , | Comments Off on Date Announced for New Waugh Biography

Tanks, but No Tanks

A brief history of the Battle of Crete has been posted on a military history weblog. In it there is a brief mention of Waugh and his Commando unit in action. This occurs near the end of the battle:

After a day’s fierce fighting, Laycock decided to retreat under cover of night to nearby Beritiana. He was joined there by Captain Royal and the Māoris, who took up separate defensive positions and eventually made their fighting retreat. Laycock and his force, however, were cut off by superior German forces near the village of Babali Khani (Agioi Pandes). Pummelled from the air by dive bombers, Layforce Detachment was unable to get away. Laycock and his brigade major, the novelist Evelyn Waugh, were able to escape by crashing through German lines in a tank. Most of the other men of the detachment and their comrades from the 20th were either killed or captured. By the end of the operation about 600 of the 800 commandos sent to Crete were listed as killed, wounded or missing. Only 23 officers and 156 others managed to get off the island.

The account of Waugh making a break through enemy lines in a tank was something he had not mentioned in his war diary nor is Guy Crouchback involved in any such action in the fictional version. Waugh does describe in his war diary the use of a tank by men of his unit but he did not participate:

In an arbour of sweet jasmine I found Bob and Freddy and two brigadiers; they had had an adventure, being attacked at close quarters by tommmy-gunners. Bob had jumped into a tank and Ken Wiley, second-in-command of A Battalion redeemed the Commandos’ honour by leading a vigorous and successful counter-attack. A few New Zealanders, mostly Maoris, had rallied and were joining us in the rearguard.

Bob is Robert Laycock, commander of the Commando, and Freddy is F.C.C. Graham, then Laycock’s brigade major. Waugh was the intelligence officer, not brigade major as described in the Weblog, so the confusion may explain how Waugh was thought to have been in the tank. In his diary account, Waugh learns of this tank “adventure” shortly after his discovery of the dead British soldier in the churchyard. Afterwards, Waugh describes how he, Laycock and Graham drove in a truck back to the place where Waugh had left “Major Hound” cowering in a drain: “Bob as politely as possible relieved him of command saying ‘You’re done up. Ken will take over from you.'” According to the diary, this all took place near the village of Babali Hani (called by Waugh “Babali Inn”) (Diaries, p. 504).

Antony Beevor in his Crete: The Battle and the Resistance (p. 203, 2005), describes the involvement of two Matilda tanks which arrived from Heraklion just in time to save Laycock and Graham (but no mention of Waugh). This incident took place when German mountain troops cut the road between Stylos and Babali Hani. Although Beevor doesn’t mention a “break” through German lines, that would appear to be what happened after the tanks arrived. The incident, according to Beevor, helped “to stiffen the resistance at Babali Hani” where Laycock set up his brigade headquarters. It was apparently there that Waugh joined them (according to his diary) coming from the other direction.

There seems to be no counterpart of the tank “adventure” in Officers and Gentlemen, at least not in that part of the narrative that follows Guy’s discovery of the dead soldier (Penguin, pp. 206-12). In the novel, Guy finds himself among his old comrades from the Halberdiers and is rejoined by the Commandos who proceeded along the road from the German lines accompanied by some New Zealanders.

Thanks to Prof. Donat Gallagher for pointing out the diary entry where Waugh mentions the tank encounter.

Share
Posted in Diaries, Officers and Gentlemen, World War II | Tagged | Comments Off on Tanks, but No Tanks

Waugh and “Dickensian”

A reviewer in the Guardian has written a survey of earlier reviews of a new BBC TV series. This is Dickensian which began with 4 of the 20 episodes earlier this week. The idea, conceived by Tony Jordan (of East Enders),  is to take some of the more memorable characters from various Dickens novels and create a “mash-up” in which they interact in a new plot having little or nothing to do with the original novels.  It sounds like a bad idea, and your correspondent’s viewing of the first episode confirmed that. The characters were hard to identify and distinguish from one other and there were way too many plot lines. This was made worse by the overall darkness of the scenes and muddiness of the sound track.

The initial reviews were decidedly mixed, and the Guardian’s commentator, Stephen Moss, was also skeptical. But he watched all 4 of this week’s episodes and now is hooked. He thinks the characters are developing new depths not achieved in their original surroundings. He also thinks Waugh’s ending of A Handful of Dust (originally published separately as a story entitled “The Man Who Liked Dickens”) supports the idea of the mash-up. The production:

has reminded [him] why, at the end of Evelyn Waugh’s A Handful of Dust, the illiterate Mr Todd is so determined to keep Tony Last at his settlement in the Amazonian jungle forever, reading Dickens’ novels aloud to him (apart, that is, from the unnamed two that have been consumed by insects) on what amounts to a continuous loop.

Waugh was dismissive of Dickens’ emotionalism, and inflicting the latter’s novels on the doomed Last as an eternal punishment might be seen as part of that critique. Mr Todd is a madman, yet perhaps in his unquenchable devotion to Dickens he is more perceptive than those who, adopting an austere adult sensibility, grow out of him. “It is delightful to start again,” says Mr Todd. “Each time I think I find more to enjoy and admire.” Truly, the occupation of a lifetime.

Well, maybe it’s worth a look at the other episodes (or at least a few of them). They are available online to stream on BBC iPlayer for the next 3 weeks. A proxy server is required to watch them online outside the U.K. but they may end up on a U.S. channel later on.

 

Share
Posted in A Handful of Dust, Short Stories, Television Programs | Tagged , | Comments Off on Waugh and “Dickensian”

Waugh and the Turtleneck

The latest New York Times Magazine has a story by Troy Patterson predicting the comeback of the turtleneck. Evelyn Waugh figures in the background material. The turtleneck’s introduction as a fashion statement is traced to the 1920s when Noel Coward brought it out of its working class origins. Waugh is cited as remarking on the turtleneck’s appearance in Oxford:

…Evelyn Waugh marveled at the popularity of the new high-necked sweater on the party scene, judging it ‘‘most convenient for lechery because it dispenses with all unromantic gadgets like studs and ties.’’ Further, the garment offered cosmetic benefits: ‘‘It also hides the boils with which most of the young men seem to have encrusted their necks.’’ That these two aspects of the turtleneck — easy access, convenient concealment — are mutually useful has forever since been appreciated by teenagers whose dates have been so rash as to raise hickeys.

The quote comes from’s Waugh’s diary entry for 18 November 1924 (Diaries, p. 188). He describes the garment as a “new sort of jumper,” not a sweater which is something worn by Americans. He found it “rather becoming” on the young men gathered at a party. This took place at Merton College in “Billy’s” rooms, apparently referring to Billy Clonmore  (Lord Clonmore, later 8th Earl of Wicklow).  Because Waugh’s diaries were not published until 1976, he cannot be claimed to have contributed much to the spread of the turtleneck’s popularity but is evidently cited as recording the beginning of its first fashionable period.

Share
Posted in Diaries, Oxford | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Waugh and the Turtleneck

Rex Mottram, the Weather Forecast and Papal Infallibility

Rex Mottram’s casual acceptance of Roman Catholic dogma scores a twofer in this week’s conservative Catholic websites. Earlier in the week, it was his understanding of sacred monkeys in the Vatican that rated a mention. Now another site, The Stream, carries a story linking Rex’s acquiescent understanding of Papal authority to a recent Vatican pronouncement on global warming. According to blogger John Zmirak:

Catholics now have it on good authority that the pope can predict the weather a hundred years out. The claim confirms as true something Evelyn Waugh once wrote as a joke. In Brideshead Revisited, the character Rex Mottram is a scheming, insincere convert to Catholicism. Eager to please, he tells the priest instructing him whatever he thinks he will want to hear. Hence the following priceless exchange, which starts with a question from the priest:

“So you understand the dogma of papal infallibility?”
“Oh yes Father.”
“Suppose the pope says that it’s going to rain tomorrow. Does that mean it will rain?”
“Oh yes Father.”
“But supposing it doesn’t rain, what then?”
“Well 
 Uh 
 I guess it would be, ah, spiritually raining. Only 
 We were too sinful to see it!”

This quote, however, isn’t exactly the way Waugh wrote it. The question Fr. Mowbray put to Rex was, “…does our Lord have more than one nature?” To that, Rex replied, “Just as many as you say, Father.” The questioning then continues more or less as in the quote. (Brideshead Revisited, Penguin, p. 185).  Zmirak goes on to argue that the recent Papal pronouncement is being interpreted by Papal spokesmen to mean that global warming is the result of human activity and not natural causes. This in turn means, according to Zmirak, that Roman Catholics “who deny that human beings are causing catastrophic global warming, and that it must be stopped through drastic restrictions on our use of energy” are committing a sin. This may be an oversimplification, but in essence Zmirak posits that, once again, as with the sacred monkeys, Rex inadvertently got it right.

Share
Posted in Brideshead Revisited, Catholicism | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Rex Mottram, the Weather Forecast and Papal Infallibility

Cordelia’s Sacred Monkeys

A Roman Catholic traditional rite weblog has posted an article arguing, somewhat tongue in cheek, that Cordelia Flyte’s fanciful tutorial for Rex Mottram’s religious instruction in Waugh’s Brideshead Revisited has, in part at least, come true. Among the beliefs she jokingly told Rex were held by Roman Catholics were, as he later naively recited them to his sponsors:

“that you have to sleep with your feet pointing East, because that’s the direction of Heaven, and if you die at night you can walk there
. And what about the Pope who made one of his horses a cardinal? And what about the box you keep in the church porch, and if you put in a pound note with someone’s name on it, they go to Hell.”

When the sponsors, Lady Marchmain and Fr. Mowbray, wondered where Rex had heard these things, Cordelia confessed:

“What a chump! 
 who would have dreamed he’d swallow it all. I told him such a lot besides 
 About sacred monkeys in the Vatican
”

These quotes come from the novel (Penguin, pp. 186-87). According to the weblog, Cordelia’s “prophesy” has now come true (if you can follow this reasoning):

On December 8, at the opening of Francis’ “Year of Mercy,” an ecological light show projected animals and endangered species onto the façade of St. Peter’s at the Vatican. Its goal was to display Francis’ Laudato Si in vivid imagery. Environmentalism effectively raises animals and all of nature to the realm of the ‘sacred,’ claiming that “everything is interconnected,” trees, mushrooms, worms, fish, apes, man, the divine. Once again, Evelyn Waugh is prophetic — sacred monkeys at the Vatican.

The article is supported by a photo from the light show.

Share
Posted in Brideshead Revisited, Catholicism | Tagged | Comments Off on Cordelia’s Sacred Monkeys

Battle at “Brideshead”

The Sunday Telegraph and Mail on Sunday both carry reports of a sibling battle at Castle Howard over the running and occupancy of the estate. The North Yorkshire estate was the setting for both film adaptations of Waugh’s novel Brideshead Revisited. Waugh himself had little contact with the Castle Howard estate or the family that owns it, and aside from a day trip to house in 1937 recorded in his Diaries (p. 420) doesn’t mention any visits.

According to the Telegraph, the current occupant, younger son Simon Howard, offered to take over management of the estate several years ago when his elder brother, Nicholas, decided he would rather be a rock star. The papers report that an eviction notice has now been issued to Simon and his family. This seems more akin to a Trollope novel that to one by Waugh. On the other hand, Waugh’s novel also involved a conflicted inheritance theme. In Brideshead Revisited, Lord Marchmain changed his will to arrange that the estate pass to his daughter Julia, rather than to his elder son “Bridey”, who would have inherited in the normal course of things. This decision seemed inspired primarily by Lord Marchmain’s dislike of Bridey’s wife, Beryl.

COMMENT (28 December 2015): Here’s a drawing by Ian Hampton inspired by this dispute.

Share
Posted in Brideshead Revisited, Diaries, Film, Television | Tagged , | Comments Off on Battle at “Brideshead”

New Book Challenges Waugh’s Views of Selassie

A new book on the life and career of Emperor Haile Selassie challenges the views of his earlier critics. The book, King of Kings: The Triumph and Tragedy of Emperor Haile Selassie I of Ethiopia, translated from the original German, is reviewed in a recent issue of the Guardian. The author is Asfa-Wossen Asserate, a relative of Selassie. According to the review

Selassie projected an image of himself as a paternalistic ruler. His ambition was to found a dynasty and “modernise” his country’s feudal system through a forward-looking (if paradoxially absolute) monarchy. His coronation in 1930 – attended by Evelyn Waugh, who Asserate describes as a “notorious sneerer” – drew ridicule for its display of sumptuously plumed and gold-braided uniforms and other regalia. Yet in lampooning Selassie as a tinpot Caesar, Waugh and other critics rather missed the point. The Napoleonic hats and gowns were part of Selassie’s vision of a parallel world equal to that of the white man. Why should the European powers have all the pomp and ceremony?

Waugh wrote about Selassie’s coronation in Remote People (1931), in the U.S. entitled They Still Were Dancing. He later wrote a fictionalized version of the same events in Black Mischief (1932).

Share
Posted in Black Mischief, Remote People | Tagged , | Comments Off on New Book Challenges Waugh’s Views of Selassie

1949 New York Times Interview with Evelyn Waugh

On Twitter, Terry Teachout draws our attention to a “forgotten” 1949 New York Times interview with Evelyn Waugh:

“The best American writer, of course,” Mr. Waugh said, “is Erle Stanley Gardner. . . . Do I really wish to say that? By all means.”

Share
Posted in Interviews, Newspapers, Twitter | Tagged , , | Comments Off on 1949 New York Times Interview with Evelyn Waugh