Ducker of the Turl (More)

Another story has appeared in connection with the closure of the shoemakers Ducker and Sons in The Turl, Oxford. See earlier post. This will occur later this month according to the story in The Oxford Times. The store’s ledgers are to be auctioned, details of which are provided in the article. Waugh is again mentioned as a former customer along with, inter alia, JRR Tolkien, some of whose purchases are described. Although not mentioned in the article, Waugh has described his relations with the shop in his Diaries. Here is the entry (p. 785) for 2 September 1961:

When Ducker of the Turl died I told Catherine Walston that I must find a new bootmaker. She took me to Thrusal of Cambridge (with whom I have dealt ever since). On my first visit he was measuring me for my last when Catherine suddenly drew attention to Thrusal’s own boot which was almost circular, like the boots ponies wore on their hooves when drawing lawn mowers. ‘That’s exactly the kind of shoe I have been looking for all my life.’ ‘I regret to say, madam, that I am obliged to wear it because of a deformity of the foot.’

A Google search for Thrusal of Cambridge failed to turn up any information and no shoemaker of a similar name came up in a broader search of the area. The premises of the Oxford shop are to be converted into a wine merchant. 

Share
Posted in Chattels & Movables, Diaries, Newspapers, Oxford | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Ducker of the Turl (More)

NYRB Reviews Eade Biography

The current issue of the New York Review of Books has a review of Philip Eade’s biography of Evelyn Waugh. This is by John Banville and is entitled “The Strange Genius of the Master.” Banville also named Eade’s book as among his best reads of the year in the Guardian. See earlier post. In another article entitled “Jesuits Admirable and Execrable,” Garry Wills considers a number of books about Jesuits. Among those listed is Waugh’s biography of Edmund Campion. Both of these articles are behind a paywall requiring a subscription to read them.

UPDATE (25 January 2017): It is worth seeking out this issue of NYRB for both of the reviews mentioned above. In Banville’s review of the Eade biography, he carefully summarizes the book and offers up his own opinions on the relatively few occasions where he differs from those of Eade or thinks more need be said. More interesting are his comments on Waugh’s work, a topic on which Eade admittedly did not dwell. For example, Banville dismisses what is Waugh’s most popular book, Brideshead Revisited, as vastly overrated:

…despite many wonderfully sustained and beautifully written passages, [it remains] a soggy mess: sentimental, queasily religiose, self indulgent–as he later came ruefully to acknowledge–dismissively class-conscious, in places embarassingly melodramatic, and in other places just plain silly.

Banville thinks Waugh’s best works are Decline and Fall (“brilliant debut”), Scoop (“eviscerated Fleet Street journalism”) and Sword of Honour (“expresses more about the nature of war and warfaring than Hemingway and Clausewitz put together”). He concludes:

Philip Eade has written a brisk, lively, and entertaining account of a strange, tormented, unique creature…While previous biographers have been respectful (Martin Stannard) or compassionate (Selina Hastings), Eade seems genuinely to like his subject, and takes Waugh largely as he presented himself to the world… 

Garry Wills’ essay on the Jesuits ambitiously lists 8 books as its subject. Among these are Waugh’s biography of Edmund Campion and the more recent (and more detailed) version by Gerard Kilroy. But Wills’ article lives up to his ambition. In its concluding section, he deals with the life of Campion (after admitting some personal interest in the subject because he went to a high school named for him) as his final Jesuit case study in which he compares Campion’s career with that of Daniel Berrigan. He finds more differences than similarities and in the process compares Waugh’s short book both with its source, the 1876 work by Richard Simpson, and with the new scholarly work by Kilroy. He explains what bits of Simpson Waugh left out where they were inconsistent with his own thesis and shows how Kilroy fills in blanks left by Simpson as well as those created by Waugh. For example, he demonstrates fairly persuasively that Campion resisted returning to England after his years in Prague where he had enjoyed a considerable success because he foresaw that other members of the mission were set on a confrontation with the Crown that he thought unnecessary and contrary to the best interests of English Catholics. This is certainly the best short essay on Campion that this correspondent has encountered and it takes only less than 1/3 of the total text.

Share
Posted in Biographies, Books about Evelyn Waugh, Brideshead Revisited, Decline and Fall, Edmund Campion, Scoop, Sword of Honour | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on NYRB Reviews Eade Biography

Rex Whistler Exhibit at Mottisfont Abbey

The Guardian has reported an exhibit of the works of artist Rex Whistler at Mottisfont Abbey, a National Trust property located in Hampshire between Winchester and Salisbury. Whistler decorated the interior of the house in the late 1930s when it was occupied by Maud Russell. Most biographies of Whistler conclude that this was one of Whistler’s most fraught country house assignments, with the owner constantly changing her mind about the details. The Guardian’s description of the exhibit tells a somewhat different story:

[Maud Russell] was portrayed as constantly interfering with Whistler’s work, changing her mind and generally making the job a misery – but that was not the truth of the relationship in her diaries, and it’s good to have this chance to set the record straight. She was highly intelligent and very interested in creating a room in keeping with the history of the house.” Whistler’s last great mural, fantasy gothic architecture covering walls and the ceiling of Russell’s huge drawing room, took far longer than expected. She tried to pay him extra, but he only accepted £100: she wrote in her diary that it was the first time in her life that anyone refused to accept her money. The diaries – A Constant Heart, edited by her granddaughter and to be published in February by Dovecote Press – also reveal her sadness when he finally did finish.

Whistler and Waugh knew each other and had a close mutual friend in Diana Cooper. Waugh admired some of Whistler’s works but had reservations about others; Whistler’s drawings were used posthumously to illustrate Waugh’s 1947 pamphlet Wine in Peace and War. Whether Waugh ever visited the murals at Mottisfont is not known to your correspondent but he was not a close friend of the family that owned it. According to the Guardian: 

Evelyn Waugh is said to have based Charles Ryder in Brideshead Revisited on Whistler – but Govier [curator of the exhibition] believes both he and Russell had far fewer affairs than credited with. Whistler was welcomed as much for his charm as his talent in a procession of wealthy houses. The designer Cecil Beaton described his conversation as “enchantingly funny”, though he added: “No gossip – doesn’t know any. No sex talk – doesn’t think of it.”

There is not much in Whistler’s character that rubbed off on Ryder except perhaps for his friendship with his Slade School classmate Stephen Tennant whose wealthy family occupied a country house not far from Mottisfont called Wilsford House. This was Whistler’s introduction to the upper class world in which he afterwards thrived. Tennant like Sebastian Flyte suffered an alcoholic decline in his later years, but Whistler unlike Ryder never married, and unlike Ryder, Whistler painted country house interiors rather than the exterior views that made Ryder’s reputation. There is another Waugh character that can more reliably based on Whistler–this is the young artist Arthur who is decorating Julia Stitch’s house in the first chapter of Scoop. The exhibit continues until April 23rd. Details are available here.

UPDATE (18 March 2017): Maud Russell’s wartime diaries (A Constant Heart) have now been published and are reviewed in a recent issue of the Daily Mail. The review is more interested in the extent to which the diaries describe her affair with Ian Fleming than to her influence on Rex Whistler’s murals.

Share
Posted in Art, Photography & Sculpture, Brideshead Revisited, Events, Newspapers, Scoop, Wine in Peace and War | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Rex Whistler Exhibit at Mottisfont Abbey

William H Pritchard Reviews New Waugh Books

Noted US literary critic William H Pritchard has reviewed the two new books about Evelyn Waugh by Philip Eade and Ann Pasternak Slater. The article entitled “Evelyn Waugh Revisited” is published in the current issue of The Hudson Review. Prof Pritchard has written widely on 20th Century English literature with full length books on John Updike, Randall Jarrell, and Robert Frost as well as several collections of essays, including one on Waugh’s generation– Seeing Through Everything: English Writers 1918-1940. 

He is disappointed with Eade’s book:

The new biography by Philip Eade seems to have been written without more purpose than providing another readable account of the life. Eade tells us he wrote the book at the request of Alexander Waugh, who gave him full access to the Waugh archives. But although Eade dutifully lists what counts as new material…there is nothing revelatory that I could determine… Eade’s book is smooth reading, but Selina Hastings’ was superbly so, and with incisive treatment of the works.

On the other hand, Prof Pritchard finds much to recommend in Pasternak Slater’s book. He begins with his own categorization of Waugh’s novels into an “early period” (everything pre-Brideshead but including The Loved One and Pinfold) and late period (all the rest). After providing his own assessment and a summary of that of Edmund Wilson, he proceeds at some length to consider how Pasternak Slater deals with the oeuvre. He sees himself in agreement with her that the early books have been given more attention that the later ones and comments that she adjusts that deficiency by herself concentrating on the late ones:

The thirty pages Pasternak Slater devotes to Brideshead Revisited are partly directed at refuting Edmund Wilson’s assertion about the end of the novel…Pasternak Slater insists …that “revelation” is the point of the novel, and that both Ryder and the reader are slowly, sometimes unwillingly, brought to this realization …

Prof Pritchard expresses some reservations on this point but then reaches Sword of Honour:

Of the hundred pages Pasternak Slater devotes to the war trilogy, I will say little except to call it the heart of her book and her appreciation of Waugh. For fullness of presentation, sharpness of argument, I don’t see that it will be bettered… Sword of Honour is the “Catholic” novel that movingly completes thirty-three years of novel writing.

Thanks once again to reader Dave Lull for sending a link to this article. Ann Pasternak Slater is among the speakers scheduled to appear at the Evelyn Waugh Conference to be convened at the Huntington Library near Pasadena, California, in May. 

Share
Posted in Academia, Biographies, Books about Evelyn Waugh, Brideshead Revisited, Sword of Honour | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Country Life Revisits “U and Non-U” Controversy

Country Life magazine has published an article reviewing the “U and Non-U” speech controversy 60 years since it raged in the 1950s after it was publicized by Nancy Mitford and Evelyn Waugh, inter alia,  in the collection of essays published as Noblesse Oblige. Waugh’s contribution first appeared as an essay in Encounter magazine (December 1955) entitled “An Open Letter to Hon. Mrs. Peter Rodd on a Very Serious Subject”.

The article by Leslie Geddes-Brown opens with this background information:

The whole thing started with an essay by Alan S. C. Ross, Professor of Linguistics at Birmingham University, in an obscure Finnish linguistic publication. At the time, he stated that: ‘It is solely by their language that the upper classes nowadays are distinguished, since they are neither cleaner, richer nor better-educated than anyone else.’ How Mitford and her co-writers, Evelyn Waugh, John Betjeman (who contributed his already published poem How to Get on in Society), Christopher Sykes and ‘Strix’ (pseudonym of Peter Fleming, brother of Ian), came across the original is anyone’s guess. And I don’t think that Prof Ross actually listed all of the words unacceptable to the upper classes. I suspect – I would like to suspect – that Mitford made a whole lot up in the spirit of pure mischief. That would make the whole episode even more fun.

What follows are several paragraphs tracing words identified as having class distinctions in the 1950s and considering the current viability of those distinctions today. It concludes:

U distinctions largely died out, I think, with the advent of media types, such as cockney actors and photographers in the 1960s, who had accents. Instead of pretending to be dukes, we were more concerned to be born with a fruity cockney accent like Michael Caine, David Bailey or Twiggy. The accent of this century is, so far, either Estuary English or Mockney and, unsurprisingly, I don’t think we much care today whether someone is nobly born or an Hon. However, although the abandonment of silly class distinctions can’t be wrong, you can bet some other way of distinguishing the posh from others lurks in our psyches.

Waugh’s “Open Letter” is collected in Essays, Articles and Reviews and is available online in the Encounter magazine archive. 

Share
Posted in Academia, Articles, Essays, Articles & Reviews, Newspapers | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Country Life Revisits “U and Non-U” Controversy

BBC Arena Waugh Trilogy Available Online

Part 1 of the 1987 BBC Arena three-part documentary, usually called the “Waugh Trilogy,” has been posted on YouTube. This is entitled “Bright Young Things.” It was last broadcast in 2008. The series was directed and narrated by Nicholas Shakespeare, and some of the readings are by actor Nigel Hawthorne, well known for his appearance as the civil servant Sir Humphrey Appleby in the BBC’s Yes, Minister series. There are two further episodes (2. “Mayfair and the Jungle” and 3. “An Englishman’s Home”), and it is hoped that these will also be posted. The video and audio on the YouTube copy of Part 1 are of high quality, and it is well worth watching. Among those interviewed in this episode are Harold Acton, Diana Mosley, Anthony Powell and Peter Quennell. 

Share
Posted in Documentaries, Television Programs | Tagged , , , | 3 Comments

Evelyn Waugh and Tolerance

In an article in the Mexican newspaper El Informador, printed in Guadalajara, Waugh is quoted as the voice of warning against indiscriminate tolerance. The article is by Maria Palomar who complains about the current reign of political correctness:

To tolerate is good. But the inability to discriminate prevents categorization and appreciation, and ultimately destroys the notion of justice. And universal tolerance leads to the situation in Mexico, and that can still get worse: since everything is valid, there is no reason to correct anyone (it is the realm of rights without duties) and, [as a consequence, to obey the law that does not obey it–como colofon, da lo mismo obedecer la ley que no obedeceria] and there is no crime to be punished.

The article offers an antidote to this dilemma in Waugh’s 1932 statement entitled “Tolerance” from John Bull magazine where he provided a contribution to an article on the “The Seven Deadly Sins of Today by Seven Famous Authors:”

Twenty-five years ago it was the fashion for those who considered themselves enlightened and progressive to cry out against intolerance as the one damning sin of the time. The agitation was well founded and it resulted in the elimination from our social system of many elements that are cruel and unjust. But in the general revolution of opinion which followed, has not more been lost than gained? It is better to be narrow-minded than to have no mind, to hold limited and rigid principles than none at all. That is the danger that faces so many people today–to have no considered opinions on any subject, to put up with what is wasteful and harmful with the excuse that there is ‘good in everything’–which in most cases means an inability to distinguish between good and bad. There are still things which are worth fighting against.

The brief notice was a teaser for a short story (not mentioned in El Informador) that appeared in an issue of John Bull about a month later. This was entitled “Too Much Tolerance” and is the ironic story of a meeting on a ship to Africa of a man who seemed perfectly happy but whose life is gradually revealed to have been ruined by his inability to distinguish the bad from the good in his personal relationships. The article is reprinted in Essays, Articles and Reviews (p. 128) and the story in the Complete Short Stories (Everyman, p. 67). The translation is by Google (with a few edits) and the Waugh quote is the original. Any improvement in the translation, especially the bracketed text, would be appreciated.

Share
Posted in Articles, Essays, Articles & Reviews, Newspapers, Short Stories | Tagged , | Comments Off on Evelyn Waugh and Tolerance

Waugh Scholar Praises Eade Biography

Profesor Donat Gallagher, one of the leading Waugh scholars and a member of the Waugh Society, has reviewed Philip Eade’s biography of Waugh. The review appears in the weekend edition of  The Australian. Prof Gallagher certainly liked the book and fully explains why. According to his review, the book:

is packed with brand new, fascinating information about Waugh, his family, his friends and lovers. As well, it “rebalances” a number of entrenched, skewed perceptions of him as a man and as a soldier. And it is irresistibly readable.

After carefully describing the new information provided from Alexander Waugh’s archive about subjects such as Waugh’s homosexual affairs at Oxford, first marriage and unrequited love affair with Teresa Jungman, Prof Gallagher comes to a matter of greater interest to him–Eade’s description of Waugh’s military career–and concludes:

Eade is the first major biographer to produce the evidence needed for a balanced account of Waugh’s military service.

But he is too modest on this point. Eade relied heavily on and fully credited his sections about Waugh’s wartime experiences to the work of Prof Gallagher in his detailed book on this topic In the Picture published in 2014. The review concludes:

Is this a good book? Yes, up to a point. It is entertainingly informative, funny, moving, readable; and the epilogue is unforgettable. But Eade is a storyteller. Apart from the military passages that refute stated charges, he does not point out what information is new, let alone analyse or discuss its importance. I can only testify, if that is the right word, that I have been researching and writing about Waugh since 1963 and that Eade time and again surprised and delighted me. My picture of Arthur Waugh, for one, is richer, more complex and less flattering than it was. The vivid image of Alec in savage mood entering a room full of people and striking it dumb says more about the relationship between the brothers than a chapter of explanation. And so with the book. What it lacks in analysis it makes up by the cumulative force of new insights that never stop coming.

Prof Gallagher is one of those scheduled to speak at the Evelyn Waugh Conference at the Huntington Library, near Pasadena, California, in May.

Share
Posted in Academia, Biographies, Books about Evelyn Waugh, Conferences, Evelyn Waugh Society, Newspapers | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Waugh Scholar Praises Eade Biography

Waugh’s Ear Trumpet (More)

Today’s Times newspaper has published an article by David Brown providing some additional information about Waugh’s ear trumpet which is to be auctioned in a few weeks’ time. See earlier post:

Although Waugh wielded the trumpet with relish he had admitted to the Duchess of Devonshire: “I don’t think I hear any better for them, but I look more dignified.” After Waugh’s death aged 62 in 1966, his trumpet gained almost mythical status among his fans. Malcolm Muggeridge, the author and satirist, described seeing Waugh for the final time at a wedding: “He made considerable play with an old-fashioned Victorian ear trumpet, though whether for use or ostentation I cannot say.”

Claud Cockburn, Waugh’s cousin, had described how the author’s “ostentatious, self-dramatising rejection of reality required, in middle life, an equally ostentatious model”. He recalled how Waugh once unscrewed the trumpet when he became bored during a speech by Muggeridge at a Foyle’s literary lunch in London. “The guest of honour could have dealt easily with some rude heckler, but the gesture with the trumpet utterly discomforted him.” Joseph Epstein wrote in the New Criterion Reader: “He is usually described as ‘brandishing’ his ear trumpet, which is not imprecise as he used it as a social weapon to make people uncomfortable.”

A comment submitted by R Morse provides more details about Cockburn’s description of Waugh useage of the instrument:

Cockburn’s original, published in The Atlantic Monthly in 1973 and reprinted in the magazine Counterpunch in 2003, was, “The guest of honour could have dealt easily with some rude heckler. But the gesture with the trumpet utterly dismayed and discomfited him.” Still, we all know what you meant, and I’m sure Oliver Kamm would support the use of a different but similar word. Incidentally, Cockburn’s article doesn’t identify Muggeridge specifically as the target: he merely describes him as “the… principal speaker was some pompous statesman; a member I think, of the cabinet, with unjustified pretensions as a scholar and writer.”

The comment goes on to explain that Cockburn’s 1973 article is also the source of the story that Waugh walked up the hill from his family’s house in Golders Green NW11 to secure a Hampstead NW3 postmark on his letters. The Times article is accompanied by a photo (which your correspondent doesn’t recall having seen previously) of Waugh wielding the trumpet.

 

Share
Posted in Auctions, Chattels & Movables, Items for Sale, Newspapers | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Waugh’s Ear Trumpet (More)

Mottramism at Work

Senior Editor of The American Conservatiive magazine Rod Dreher has posted in his blog on the magazine’s website an example of what he calls “Mottramism” at work in the higher echelons of the Roman Catholic Church. He defined the concept several years ago based on the writings of Evelyn Waugh:

This takes its name, of course, from Rex Mottram, Julia Flyte’s husband in Brideshead Revisited. At one point, Rex decides to convert to Catholicism in order to have a proper Church wedding with Julia. But the sincerity of his conversion becomes suspect when he is willing to agree with any absurdity proposed in the name of Catholic authority, and shows no intellectual curiosity into its truth or falsehood. As his Jesuit instructor, Father Mowbray describes his catechetical progress:

“Yesterday I asked him whether Our Lord had more than one nature. He said: ‘Just as many as you say, Father.’ Then again I asked him: ‘Supposing the Pope looked up and saw a cloud and said ‘It’s going to rain’, would that be bound to happen?’ ‘Oh, yes, Father.’ ‘But supposing it didn’t?’ He thought a moment and said, “I suppose it would be sort of raining spiritually, only we were too sinful to see it.’”

He doesn’t use the word, but … Carlo Lancellotti, a mathematics professor who comments on this blog…writes today about Mottramism in the current papal court — specifically, in the public statements of Father Antonio Spadaro, a Jesuit priest who is in Pope Francis’s inner circle.

It probably helps to be Roman Catholic to appreciate the intricacies of what follows, but one has a good idea from Dreher’s definition of “Mottramism” what to expect. Here’s a link to the full posting. Thanks to Dave Lull for passing it on to us.

Share
Posted in Brideshead Revisited, Catholicism | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Mottramism at Work