Early March Roundup

–An exhibit in London which may be of interest is mentioned in the papers. This is Vanbrugh: The Drama of Architecture. Here are the details:

300 years after his death, a major new exhibition exploring one of the UK’s greatest architects – Sir John Vanbrugh (1664–1726) – is now open at Sir John Soane’s Museum.

Hailed as ‘The Rockstar of the English Baroque’ and ‘The original starchitect’, Vanbrugh designed some of the UK’s most admired and loved country houses, including Blenheim Palace and Castle Howard, with each one featuring his signature ability to exploit the emotional impact of architecture by making exciting and dramatic use of light and shadow, recessions and projections. Sir John Soane (1753-1837) cited Vanbrugh as one of his great influences, remarking that he had “all the fire and power of Michelangelo and Bernini”.

Curated by Sir Charles Saumarez Smith CBE and architect Roz Barr, the exhibition features never-before-exhibited drawings from the V&A and Sir John Soane’s Museum, including many in Vanbrugh’s own hand, and is an opportunity to see a selection of Vanbrugh’s drawings for major projects like Castle Howard, but also smaller, more experimental plans for schemes such as the housing estate he envisaged at Greenwich.

Perhaps overshadowed by contemporaries Nicholas Hawksmoor and Sir Christopher Wren, the emotional impact and imagination of Vanbrugh has continued to be admired, particularly by architects, in the centuries since. The exhibition highlights Vanbrugh’s enduring architectural ideas and influence, including on two of the most influential architects of the 20th century, Robert Venturi (1925-2018) and Denise Scott Brown (b.1931). A new short film by filmmakers Anita Naughton and Jim Venturi, their son, explores this connection and will be shown on loop in the Museum’s Foyle Space.

The exhibition is part of the #VANBRUGH300celebrations organised by The Georgian Group, which will include events and activities across the year at six of the architect’s most significant creations.

Waugh mentions Vanbrugh several times in his writings.

The Times has an article about a new book by Adrian Wooldridge entitled Centrists of the World Unite. It opens with this:

Early on in Evelyn Waugh’s novel Vile Bodies, set amid the chaos and fragmentation of the 1920s, the protagonist describes Shepheard’s Hotel in Mayfair as a place where one can “still draw up, cool and uncontaminated, great, healing draughts from the well of Edwardian certainty”.

One might say something similar about Adrian Wooldridge’s new book. It is a place where the centrists among us, demoralised by the rise of populism, can draw up great healing draughts of 1990s “end of history” certainty about liberalism. It’s all going to be OK, lads, Wooldridge assures us. Liberalism is in retreat but it is not defeated. It can and must be renewed, as it has been before…

The Spectator has an article entitled “British politics has become a Devil’s Wheel” that opens with this:

There is a moment in Evelyn Waugh’s Decline and Fall which has been much on my mind lately. It is the bit towards the very end of the novel when our hero, Paul Pennyfeather, re-encounters the sinister modernist architect Professor Otto Silenus. By this point Pennyfeather has undergone all manner of travails. He has been debagged and sent down from Oxford, accused of human-trafficking and sent to prison. But, as the pair sit outside the Corfu villa in which Pennyfeather is staying, the professor suddenly offers to reveal his theory about the meaning of life.

Silenus describes a particular fairground attraction, the Devil’s Wheel (‘the big wheel at Luna Park’). For five francs the public can go into a room with tiers of seats. At the centre is a great revolving floor which spins around fast. People try to clamber up the revolving floor and get to the center of the wheel. How everyone whoops and hollers as they similarly get flung around and fail…

–The website Medium has posted an article by Ilaria Salvatori comparing Waugh’s novel Brideshead Revisited with what may be a relatively recently translated Italian novel by Goliarda Sapienza. Here’s the opening:

A Comparative Analysis: Brideshead Revisited (1945) and The Art of Joy (1998)

There is a narrative architecture common to both novels that warrants immediate attention. An outsider of modest origins, the middle-class artist Charles Ryder in one, the Sicilian peasant girl Modesta in the other, comes into contact with a declining aristocratic family. They assimilate its codes, wander its halls, and eventually settle within its walls. In both cases, the ancestral home is a living organism, heavy with history and symbolic power: Brideshead Castle in England, and Villa Brandiforti in Sicily.

Up to this point, the resemblance is striking. However, from this shared threshold, the two novels diverge toward opposite horizons. Understanding how and why they diverge is perhaps the most precise way to read them both…

The full article is available here.

Share
Posted in Brideshead Revisited, Decline and Fall, Exhibits, Newspapers, Vile Bodies | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Daily Telegraph Reviews BBC Waugh Series

The Daily Telegraph has posted a review of Russell Kane’s series of programs about Evelyn Waugh and his works. (See earlier posts.) This is by Jane Shilling, but it is not clear whether she has seen the entire series. Here are the opening paragraphs:

It is almost 60 years since the novelist Evelyn Waugh died on Easter Day 1966, and the comedian Russell Kane is marking the anniversary with a Radio 4 series, Waugh, What Is He Good For?

Starting today, Kane explores the themes of Waugh’s major novels, from Decline and Fall to the Sword of Honour trilogy. It is not the first time that the comedian has championed his literary hero. He chose Waugh as his specialist subject for Celebrity Mastermind – and won (joking that for true authenticity he should have come a poor third, echoing Waugh’s Oxford degree).

He argued the novelist’s case in Radio 4’s Great Lives, and in his series Evil Genius he attempted to defend Waugh against the preconceptions (or in one case complete ignorance) of three fellow comedians, two of whom knew his writing only from the 1981 television adaptation of Brideshead Revisited – a work about, as one puts it: “Toffs with problems they don’t want to talk about.”

In his exposition of what Waugh is good for, Kane has consistently taken the pure (and intrepidly retro) academic position of separating the writing from the writer, summarising him in Evil Genius as a “grumpy, drunken, elitist bore who wrote the most beautiful, exquisite, pared-down prose that could go right to the heart of emotional delinquency in people.”

It is a distinction that escaped the presenter of Great Lives, the journalist and former Conservative MP Matthew Parris, who complained that Waugh “doesn’t seem a very nice man”, expressing his preference for novelists whose company he thought he might have enjoyed, such as Jane Austen or George Eliot…

The full review (entitled “Are we too woke for Evelyn Waugh?”) is currently posted by Yahoo (linked here) but you might not want to wait too long to connect if you want to read it.

Share
Posted in Lectures, Newspapers, Radio, Radio Programs | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

BBC Announces Another Waugh Rerun

In addition to the several Waugh-related programs about to be broadcast by the BBC (as discussed in previous post), they have recently announced another one. This is the rebroadcast of a 90-minute radio adaptation of Vile Bodies. This was originally transmitted in 1970. Here is the information:

Time: 1928. Place: mainly London.

The decadent exploits of the Bright Young Things of the late 1920s, artistic socialites in a world that vanished before the Second World War.

Starring John Standing as Adam, Lynn Redgrave as Agatha Runciple and Anna Cropper as Nina.

Evelyn Waugh’s 1930 satire adapted by Barry Campbell.

Adam … John Standing
Agatha Runciple … Lynn Redgrave
Nina … Anna Cropper
Lottie … Julia Lang
Mrs Ape … Margaret Robertson
Drunken Major … Alan Lawrance
Lord Balcairn … Ian Lubbock
Colonel Blount … Anthony Jacobs
Social editress … Grizelda Hervey
Ginger Littlejohn … Sean Arnold
Mrs Florin … Lynn Carson
Benfleet, a publisher … Leo Maguire
Matron … Diana Robson
Customs Chief/Judge … Malcolm Hayes
Mr. Brown – Prime Minister … Gerald Cross
Mrs. Brown … Pauline Wynn
Miles Malpractice … Richard Griffiths
Margot Metroland … Carol Boyer
Faith … Patricia Gallimore
Chastity … Elizabeth Morgan
all other parts by members of the cast

Producer: R D Smith

First broadcast on BBC Radio 4 in October 1970.

For more details about the rebroadcast which is rescheduled for 6-7 March, see this link.

 

Share
Posted in Adaptations, Radio, Vile Bodies | Tagged | Leave a comment

Lenten Roundup

–Lancing College has announced the details of this year’s Evelyn Waugh Lecture. Here is the announcement:

The Head Master, Dr Scott Crawford, requests the pleasure of your company at the Evelyn Waugh Lecture and Annual Foundation Dinner, to be held on Thursday 30 April 2026 at Lancing College.

Guest Speaker: Juliet Nicolson, British author and journalist

Juliet Nicolson is a social historian.
Her books about life in Britain in the 20th Century include The Perfect Summer of 1911, The Great Silence 1918-20 and Frostquake, the icy winter of 1962-3.
Her memoir A House Full of Daughters was followed by The Book of Revelations 1950s-2026, about women and their secrets.
She lives with her husband Charles Anson  in East Sussex.

Programme

6.45pm – Drinks in the Megarry Room
7.30pm – Lecture in the Sanderson Room
8.30pm – Dinner in the Dining Hall
10.30pm – Carriages

Dress code: Lounge Suit or equivalent

[N. B.] Attendance is by invitation only and is extended exclusively to donors to the Foundationers’ Campaign.
If you would like to make a donation or find out more about the campaign, please contact (click to email).

Inasmuch as there is not necessarily any extended discussion of Waugh or his works, it seems unlikely that the school would extend space available invitations to Waugh Society members as it has in the past.

The Spectator has an article by Flora Watkins about the former Prince Andrew in which she focusses on his upbringing in the royal household. Here’s how she concludes:

…There’s no dignified way out of this for Andrew, no tidy, convenient Lewis Carroll ending where he wakes up to find it was all a dream. What would the Queen have made of this latest installment in this sordid saga? Her Majesty might have gained some comfort from the fact her darling Andrew wasn’t alone yesterday, on his 66th birthday. For as Evelyn Waugh observed, anyone who has been to a British public school will always feel comparatively at home in jail.

The full article is available here. 

–The Roman Catholic journal Tablet opens the lenten issue of its weekly online update with this:

St Macarius, the fourth-century Bishop of Jerusalem, appears as a put-upon provincial clergyman in Helena, Evelyn Waugh’s bouncy novel about the mother of Constantine and the True Cross. He is appalled by the Emperor’s plans for architectural glories to honour the holy places. His Lent is unsubtle:

It was a season not yet standardised in its austerity. At Jerusalem, where they kept holiday on Saturday as well as on Sunday, there were eight five-day weeks of fasting. And when Macarius said ‘fast’ he meant quite simply ‘starve’. Other dioceses indulged in mitigations – wine, oil, milk, little snacks of olives and cheese – which allowed the faithful to maintain a state of continuous rabbit-like nibbling. In Jerusalem if a man wished to attain the rewards of fasting he lived on water and thin gruel and nothing else. Some kept the full five days on this fare; many took Wednesdays off and dined heavily; others, weaker still, dined on Tuesdays and Thursdays. It was left to each to judge his own capacity. But if he did fast, he must fast thoroughly; that was Macarius’s rule.

Working on Helena was one of Waugh’s Lenten resolutions in 1948, along with abstaining from wine and tobacco. That’s a more familiar agenda than the neatly-sketched ascetism of the Early Church, as is Waugh’s failure to get the book to the printers until 1950. Lent turns our New Year’s resolutions into religious obligations, with absolutely no discernible effect on the rate of success.

Dietary rules have all sorts of benefits for personal and social health. Elizabeth I’s chief advisor William Cecil was so alarmed by the damage done to the English fishing fleet after the Reformation by the end of the Friday abstinence that he introduced a bill – dubbed “Cecil’s fast” – to make it a misdemeanour to eat meat on a Friday or a Saturday, with a half-fish day on Wednesday for good measure. We’re now accustomed to inversions like Dry January threatening the pub trade.

–The Guardian has posted an article in which it identifies and discusses the “greatest ever TV romances”. Here’s a contribution by Sarah Dempster:

Charles, Sebastian and Julia in Brideshead Revisited

Share
Posted in Brideshead Revisited, Helena, Lancing, Lectures, Newspapers | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

BBC Marks 60th Anniversary of Waugh’s Death

The BBC has recently posted schedules of several upcoming programs that appear to mark its recognition of Waugh’s death 60 years ago in 1966. Most prominently it has commissioned Russell Kane to record commentaries on 7 of Waugh’s books. These will be broadcast on BBC Radio 4 starting 2 March. The series is entitled “Waugh: What’s He Good For?” Here is their description:

Many people hold Evelyn Waugh among the best British writers of the 20th Century -Russell Kane is one of them. To mark the 60th anniversary of his death, Russell delves into seven of Waugh’s most important works.

While Waugh has been unfashionable for some time, Kane believes it’s high time to turn back to him. He says he was way ahead of his time and, in his books, he reveals ourselves to ourselves and uncovers clues for how we should live our lives today.

Over seven episodes, Waugh tells us everything we need to know about the cluttered corridors of English culture – its class system, media, cult of masculinity, colonial hang-ups: everything it’s made of, good and bad. Not only does Waugh show our society for what it is, but he demonstrates how it can be hacked – infiltrated by savvy interlopers like himself. And Russell sees a kindred spirit.

Waugh may be a divisive figure, with the public reputation of a pantomime villain. Some say Waugh’s vitriolic streak, cultural insensitivity and idolisation of the upper classes should condemn him to the male, pale and stale literary past – but Russell believes he is prescient, not reactionary, that he was ahead of his time. Waugh holds the least flattering of mirrors up to us – and actually, it’s not Waugh but what we see that we don’t like.

In episode 1, we turn the pages of Decline And Fall (1928) – a book about social mobility. Russell knows what it’s like to be dropped into a social milieu to which you don’t belong. The novel is clever, depicting an array of characters from different backgrounds who all want to join a party they’re not invited to – and none of them behave as they ought. How do you penetrate what it’s vulgar to aspire to, and what do you do when you leave your background behind?

The details are available at this link.

On the same day there will be a rebroadcast of a 1990 production of Waugh’s novel The Loved One. This will also appear on BBC Radio 4 and will consist of three 30 minute episodes. Here’s a decription:

Hollywood, 1947. Failed poet/screenwriter Dennis Barlow has disgraced the English community by taking a job in a pets’ cemetery.

He is given the chance to redeem himself by arranging a colleague’s funeral, but love rather than redemption looms at the Whispering Glades Funeral Home.

Starring Rupert Graves as Dennis Barlow and Miranda Richardson as Aimee Thanatogenous.

Evelyn Waugh’s 1948 satire on the American way of death, adapted in three episodes by Bill Matthews.

Dennis Barlow …. Rupert Graves
Aimee Thanatogenous …. Miranda Richardson
Sir Ambrose Abercrombie …. Donald Pickering
Sir Francis Hinsley …. Ronald Fraser
Baumbein …. Bob Sessions
Mrs Heinkel …. Lorelei King
Mr Heinkel …. Garrick Hagon
Mr Schultz …. Graham Hoadly
Came …. Elizabeth Mansfield
Erikson …. Simon Treves
Schindler …. David Bannerman

Producer: Lissa Evans

First broadcast on BBC Radio 4 in October 1990.

Information is available here.

Finally, there will be a rebroadcast of a 1953 interview of Waugh by three BBC reporters. This interview was part of a series called “Frankly Speaking.”  It had important ramifications for Waugh’s future writing as was reflected in his novel The Ordeal of Gilbert Pinfold as described in the BBC’s notice:

Brideshead Revisited author Evelyn Waugh is grilled about his life and career by a panel of three:

* Charles Wilmot
* Jack Davies
* Stephen Black

Regarded as one of the most brilliant novelists of his day, Waugh loathed the BBC.

His grandson Alexander believes that this interview, along with a cocktail of sleeping draughts, helped to send him “rather mad”. The author later turned his experience on Frankly Speaking into a scene in his novel ‘The Ordeal of Gilbert Pinfold’ with Stephen Black becoming the character Angel who haunts Pinfold in his hallucinations.

Launched in 1952 on the BBC Home Service, Frankly Speaking was a novel, ground breaking series. Unrehearsed and unscripted, the traditional interviewee/interviewer pairing was initially jettisoned for three interviewers firing direct questions – straight to the point.

Early critics described it as ‘unkempt’, ‘an inquisition’ and described the guest as prey being cornered, quarry being pursued – with calls to axe the unscripted interview. But the format won out and eventually won over its detractors.

Unknown or very inexperienced broadcasters were employed as interviewers, notably John Freeman, John Betjeman, Malcolm Muggeridge, Harold Hobson, Penelope Mortimer, Elizabeth Beresford and Katherine Whitehorn.

Only about 40 of the original 100 programmes survive.

First broadcast on the BBC Home Service in November 1953.

The rebroadcast will be on BBC Radio 4 Extra, 28 Feb 2026. Details appear at this link.

 

 

 

Share
Posted in Anniversaries, Decline and Fall, Interviews, Radio, The Loved One, The Ordeal of Gilbert Pinfold | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Latest Issue of EWS Is Posted

Jamie Collinson has posted the latest issue of the Evelyn Waugh Studies (No. 56.2). Here’s his description:

Edition 56.2 of Evelyn Waugh Studies is now available for your reading pleasure. Within, Jeffrey Manley reviews Lady Pamela Berry: Passion, Politics and Power, by Harriet Cullen. Berry was an English socialite and member of the Bright Young Things, and had a long running acquaintance with Waugh.

While Manley finds some worrying omissions in the book’s sources, there is a great deal here to fascinate Waugh fans. One of my own favourite Waugh stories involves a panic over the theft of his gold watch amid an insalubrious party, and I had forgotten that Berry played a key role in this vignette – and its reporting in the press. The book features Cambridge spies, Anthony Powell, disastrous holidays, sabotaged Alec Guinness performances, and our old friend Randolph Churchill. Fill your boots.

This edition’s news section is particularly entertaining and wide ranging. The John H. Wilson Jr. Evelyn Waugh Undergraduate Essay Contest is once again open for submissions; Father Gerard Garrigan has written a new poem inspired by Graham Greene; a bookseller has contacted the EWS with an intriguing (and bargainous) copy of Waugh’s Knox biography; Robert Harris reveals a writing credo based on a Waugh quote; and I for one learned that Irvine Welsh took inspiration as much from Evelyn Waugh as he did Acid House music.

 

Share
Posted in Evelyn Waugh Studies | Leave a comment

Spectator Compares Waugh Novel to Current BBC Series

The Spectator  has an article by Alexander Larman in which he compares the current BBC drama series Industry to Waugh’s novel Brideshead Revisited. Given the contents of Industry, which follows the careers of several young characters working at a London investment bank, this seems something of a stretch. As it turns out, it is the satire and not the story that Larman finds comparable. This is suggested in the title: “Is ‘Industry’ the ‘Brideshead Revisited’ of our times? The BBC show is as satirical as Evelyn Waugh.” Here’s the opening paragraph:

At first glance, there are few similarities between Brideshead Revisited, Evelyn Waugh’s classic 1945 novel – later adapted into an equally classic ITV series – of prelapsarian bliss in Oxford and Industry, the BBC’s adrenaline-fuelled show that exposes the dark iniquity at the heart of the financial industry. The one is a languid examination of (discreetly portrayed) same-sex love and Catholic guilt, and the other is a profane, sexually charged and palpitation-inducing dive into hedonistic self-indulgence. Brideshead is plover’s eggs and Meursault; Industry class A drugs and group sex. They would seem as distinct from one another as chalk and (Comté) cheese…

Larman then proceeds to state his case for the similarities between the two satirical presentations. This is well worth reading and makes his case for similarity very well. It concludes with this:

…If Evelyn Waugh could be raised from the dead and put in front of a television set to be shown what his distant descendants have come up with, he would probably harrumph and mutter something about how disgusting it all is. He would not be wrong. Yet if Waugh’s initial disdain for the show could be overcome, he would surely see that Industry is the natural rejection of the veneration for all things traditional and English that Brideshead epitomised. In that book’s case, it was Catholicism that led to ‘the twitch upon the thread’, whereas in the later show, it is money, filthy and horribly desirable, that lies at the heart of the moral decay all its characters are plunged headlong into.

Will it end well for any of them? I doubt it, but that’s why it’s so disgustingly watchable. ‘I had been there before; I knew all about it’, Waugh’s protagonist Charles Ryder muses when he, quite literally, revisits Brideshead. Those revisiting the world of banking know all about it, too, and plunge headlong into debauchery, immersing themselves in the gutter while the stars twinkle sadly a long, long way away.

The complete article is available here. Episode 5 of Series 4 is broadcast today on BBC One and will be available (along with all episodes of this and previous series) on BBC iPlayer thereafter. It is also available in North America on HBO.

Share
Posted in Articles, Brideshead Revisited, Newspapers, Television Programs | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Roundup: Waugh Widely Cited in London Papers

—-A novel by Duff Cooper (husband of Waugh’s friend Diana Mitford) was briefly noted in a recent issue of Evening Standard. This novel has been reissued in the Penguin Classics series. The notice is by Melanie McDonagh. Here’s an excerpt:

Operation Mincemeat is one of the better known operations of the Second World War, thanks to the film of the same name which was turned into an improbable musical. It caught the imagination because it was so very macabre: the body of a British officer would be found washed up near the coast of Spain bearing details of an intended action in Greece and Sardinia — to distract attention from the real operation, the liberation of Sicily…

This was the scenario for Operation Heartbreak, the only novel of Duff Cooper, best known as the husband of the beautiful Lady Diana Cooper, to whom he was consistently unfaithful, a persecutor of PG Wodehouse and Tory politician. …The story is briskly told but with the unconscious insight and detail that you get from inhabiting the time and place in which the novel is situated. It doesn’t match Evelyn Waugh’s work of the period — you don’t feel that we lost a great novelist in Cooper — but it’s poignant and moving, all the more for being adjacent to reality.

Waugh and Duff Cooper kept their distance from each other but that didn’t keep Cooper from admiring Waugh’s writing style sufficiently to try to copy it.

–The Daily (or perhaps Sunday) Telegraph has a story about foreign relations between the UK and Canada. These remind the author (David Blair) of a Waugh novel:

…It seems incredible now, but British Foreign Secretaries used to mount “campaigns” on subjects like media freedom, religious liberty, wildlife conservation and sexual violence, as if countering Russian aggression and Chinese ambitions for global power were not enough to fill their time.

They would call conferences on these issues and drum up attendance by striking preposterous deals with their counterparts: if you come to my event, I’ll attend yours. Listening to these phone calls, I would silently recite the words of Julia Stitch in Evelyn Waugh’s Scoop: “Why would I go to Viola Chasm’s Distressed Area party; did she come to my Model Madhouse?”…

…That novel comes up again in a Guardian profile of author Nussaibah Younis:

The book that made me want to be a writer

Scoop by Evelyn Waugh is a brilliantly funny satire of war journalism that still rings disturbingly true. It inspired me to write a comedy about a bonkers UN programme in Iraq – which turned into my debut novel, Fundamentally.

The same writer also mentions the novel in a recent article in The Times (2 February 2026) where she is asked to name her favorite book by a dead writer:

Scoop by Evelyn Waugh. In this brilliant satire of war journalism, the nature columnist William Boot is accidentally sent to cover “a very promising little war” in the fictional east African state of Ishmaelia. I read it after spending the best part of ten years wandering around the Middle East trying and failing to “build peace” and I related hard to Waugh’s hapless and naive protagonist as he encounters an industry more cynical and mercurial than he could have imagined.

Waugh perfectly depicts the absurdities of westerners utterly out of their depth in foreign war zones and, despite being published in 1938, it still rings disturbingly true to this day. Even the cringeworthy racism of the book is not a million miles off from the way British aid workers and journalists still talk about the foreign countries they exploit for a living, and end up resenting. For anyone interested in satire, war journalism or the long tradition of Brits being idiots abroad, it’s a foundational read.

The Times also has an article by Ed Potton about film-maker Emerald Fennell and her latest production, Wuthering Heights:

…she turned up the outrageousness further in Saltburn (2023), a twisted mash-up of Brideshead Revisited and The Talented Mr Ripley with extra smut in which Barry Keoghan’s lower-class interloper Oliver Quick became obsessed with his fellow Oxford undergrad, the blithe toff Felix (Jacob Elordi). Oliver danced naked through a mansion to Sophie Ellis-Bextor’s Murder on the Dancefloor, drank Felix’s semen-laced bathwater and humped his love object’s burial mound, while Evelyn Waugh spun in his grave. That last scene, Fennell has said, was “sort of inspired” by Wuthering Heights, in which Heathcliff digs up Cathy’s grave, twice.

She was an “incredible” director on Saltburn, [actor in that film Richard E.] Grant says. “Her jolly-hockey-sticks voice beguiles you into thinking that you’re in for a St Trinian’s escapade, but her dark sensibility skewers that with her unflinching examination of class and sexual obsession. After winning an Oscar, mothering two children under the age of five, leading a crew of 150 and a large cast, she wore her authority very lightly.”…

Waugh’s novel comes up again in a later discussion of Fennell’s education:

…She read English at Greyfriars, the Catholic friary that was at the time a private hall of the University of Oxford, indulging a Brideshead fetish” by striding about in Thirties-style men’s trousers and braces. Affected play-acting like that fed directly into Saltburn, she has said. “So much of everything I make is me trying to come to terms with what an embarrassing person I am.”…

–Finally, The Times had another story that featured Waugh’s novel. This is in an article by Jack Blackburn on a current exhibit at London Archives. The topic of the exhibit is “History of London’s Outlaws”).

Modern policing had different concerns from highwaymen and the like. The exhibition runs into the 1920s, with the story of Kate Meyrick, the inspiration for Evelyn Waugh’s Ma Mayfied in Brideshead Revisited, who ran numerous illicit nightclubs and was sent to prison for breaking licensing laws.

Was this a censorious incident in a post-war age where there was an appetite for fun? Or the dawning of a more sensible age of regulation?

A handsome photo (probably from the exhibit) accompanies the article. Here’s a link.

Share
Posted in Adaptations, Articles, Brideshead Revisited, Exhibits, Scoop | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Allan Massie (16 October 1938 – 3 February 2026) R.I.P.

Novelist and journalist Allan Massie has died earlier this week. Among his obituaries, several mention a connection of his early fictional works with those of Evelyn Waugh. His son Alexander Massie writes:

…His novels … ranged widely. He began with comedies of manners – very much in the school of Evelyn Waugh – but his chief interests were political and historical. He believed writing was a form of carpentry: style could be important but function trumped form. He disliked mannered or overly-perfumed prose and his own style was clipped and epigrammatic. “I am a dandy who can no longer be bothered to dress” was the arresting – to my mind – first line of “The Death of Men”, his roman a clef about the kidnapping of Aldo Moro.

The Times elaborates the point somewhat:

…The first of his 20 novels, Change and Decay in All Around I See, an Evelyn Waugh-style comedy, appeared in 1978, closely followed by The Last Peacock, a comedy of manners. But it was his third, The Death of Men, based on the kidnapping and murder of the Italian prime minister, Aldo Moro, that won him critical attention, with Encounter magazine describing him as “perhaps the finest living Scottish author”. The book won a Scottish Arts Council Book Award.

Finally, the Daily Telegraph indirectly elaborates this connection:

…In 1976 he began to review fiction …. After several false starts he completed and published his first novel, Change and Decay in All Around I See (1978), which he later described as “a somewhat scrappy comedy of low life in London”. He was pleased at the time with a party scene that lasted for several pages with all the dialogue left unattributed, but later came to regard such feats of ingenuity as rather pointless.

All three of the obituaries cited and linked above are worth reading. You will also find numerous references to Waugh and his work by searching “Allan Massie” in EWS News.

 

 

Share
Posted in Newspapers, Obituaries | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Two Interesting Waugh Articles

On the same day late last week, two interesting and provocative articles were posted, both of which revolve around Waugh and his fictional characters. The first is entitled “Waugh Warned Us”. It was written by Paul Bauman and appeared in the religious/political magazine Commonweal. Here’s an excerpt from the opening paragraphs:

…In trying to make sense of [Donald] Trump’s preposterous and perilous ascendency, I have at last come to the realization that it bears an uncanny resemblance to the career of Rex Mottram, the ambitious businessman, playboy, and opportunistic British politician in Evelyn Waugh’s 1945 novel Brideshead Revisited. Mottram’s political cynicism, like Trump’s, recalls Henry Adams’s famous description of democratic politics as “the systematic organization of hatreds.”

The article then continues with what appears to be a fairly exhaustive and lively comparison of how closely Waugh’s character from the 1930-40s comes to resemble today’s American politician. The closing is quoted in full below:

…When the revelation of Mottram’s earlier marriage and divorce prevents his Catholic marriage to Julia, he sounds exactly like Trump in thinking that every problem has a financial solution. “All right then, I’ll get an annulment,” he declares. “What does it cost? Who do I get it from?”

“You know Father Mowbray hit on the truth about Rex at once, that it took me a year of marriage to see,” Julia tells Ryder.

He simply wasn’t all there. He wasn’t a complete human being at all. He was a tiny bit of one, unnaturally developed; something in a bottle, an organ kept alive in a laboratory. I thought he was a sort of primitive savage, but he was something absolutely modern and up-to-date that only this ghastly age could produce. A tiny bit of a man pretending he was the whole.

And now his doppelganger sits in the White House, counting his gold, gilding his walls, and subjecting the rest of us to his stunted vision of the world.

Like all great novelists, Waugh saw clearly an aspect of the future hidden from most of his contemporaries. Eighty years ago, in a moment of great triumph for liberal democracy, he understood the dangers of casting aside the past and every traditional moral sentiment in pursuit of fame and fortune. He warned about a future where every difficult question will be answered with a snort: “Quiet, Piggy!” He warned us not to give the Rex Mottrams of the world our attention, or our votes.

The complete article is available here and is well worth reading.

The other article is somewhat shorter but equally interesting. It is written by Dwight Longenecker and appears in yet another religious/political journal, The Imaginative Conservative. It compares another character from Brideshead Revisited to a character in a roughly contemporary American novel. The article is entitled “Nick Carraway and Charles Ryder: Characters of Delusion and Decadence”.  Here are the introduction and opening paragraphs:

One comes away from both F. Scott Fitzgerald’s “The Great Gatsby” and Evelyn Waugh’s “Brideshead Revisited” with an acute sense of the emptiness of the jazz age and the despair at the heart of all our delusions and decadence. One also can’t help but compare the lives of the authors themselves.

On re-reading The Great Gatsby (thanks to Ignatius Press’ newly published critical edition) and meeting again F. Scott Fitzgerald’s narrator, Nick Carraway, I couldn’t help being reminded of that other observer of delusion and decadence: Evelyn Waugh’s Charles Ryder.

Carraway—a simple bond salesman from the midwest is drawn into the glittering world of the seemingly sophisticated socialite Jay Gatsby. Charles Ryder—a modest Oxford student is drawn into the opulent champagne and strawberries world of Lord Sebastian Flyte. Both stories unfold in a sumptuous setting: Gatsby’s fantastic mansion in West Egg and Brideshead Castle—the ancestral pile of the Marquess of Marchmain. Carraway observes the decadence of 1920s American “new money,” while Ryder is drawn into the decay of 1920s English “old money”. Whether the money is old or new, and the characters archaic or parvenu, the delusion and decadence compare…

There follows a brief, well-written comparison of the two characters and a discussion of their historical significance. The article concludes with this:

…Waugh manages his moral neatly with a poetic “twitch of the thread”. Where Fitzgerald fails Waugh succeeds by placing a beacon of hope at the end of his tale: the darkened chapel heavy with incense and the flame of the sanctuary lamp re-lit before the beaten copper doors of the tabernacle.

As with the earlier article, this one is available on the internet and well worth reading in full.

Share
Posted in Articles, Brideshead Revisited, Newspapers | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment