A Wavian Christmas, or Two

Magnus Linklater begins his Christmas column in The Times by looking at how noted diarists from the past have marked the holiday:

Christmas does not always bring out the best in us — but did it ever? Diarists of the past found it, more often than not, a gloomy day. Sam Pepys, on Christmas Day 1661, noted mournfully: “Dined at home all alone, and taking occasion from some fault in the meat to complain of my maid’s sluttery, my wife and I fell out, and I up to my chamber in discontent.”

Evelyn Waugh, on December 25, 1919, wrote: “A poor Christmas Day . . . like birthdays, Christmas gets duller and duller. Soon it will be merely a day when the shops are most inconveniently shut.” He was 16 at the time, but did not grow much cheerier in later life: “Christmas Day always makes me feel a little sad . . . a dreary day.”

Harold Nicolson came close to despair in 1941 (but then who wouldn’t?): “Vita [his wife] gives me books and an alarm clock to wake me up. But it stops at once. I sit indoors all day, feeling rotten.” Sir Henry Channon, who relished the gossip and foibles of high society, was equally miserable that same year, as Christmas came and went. “I am profoundly unhappy and lonely, really,” is his diary entry. “My life is a mess.”

Waugh’s best-known description of Christmas is probably that (or those) in Brideshead Revisited. There are at least two at Brideshead Castle that I can recall (1960, rev. ed. pp. 139ff and 169ff), neither particularly joyful but reflecting some humor, mostly at the expense of Mr Samgrass. Later (p. 306), Charles describes the Ryder family Christmas Day celebration at the house of his uncle (Cousin Jasper’s father), where Charles joins his wife, Celia, and their children before he returns to Julia with whom he has been living at Brideshead Castle for the past two years:

…here among the holly and mistletoe and the cut spruce, the parlour games ritually performed, the brandy-butter and the Carlsbad plums, the village choir in the pitch-pine minstrels’ gallery, gold twine and sprigged wrapping-paper, [Celia] and I were accepted, whatever ugly rumours had been afloat in the past year, as man and wife.

 

Share
Posted in Brideshead Revisited, Diaries, Evelyn Waugh, Festivals, Newspapers | Tagged , , | Comments Off on A Wavian Christmas, or Two

A Tale of Two Adaptations

The popular culture criticism website PopMatters.com has reposted a 2006 review of the 1965 film adaptation of Waugh’s novel The Loved One. This review by Bill Gibon focuses more on the director Tony Richardson’s version than on Waugh’s story. He begins by noting that in the mid 1960s

…Richardson wanted to continue the cinematic revolution he started with Tom Jones‘ jumbled, jangled self-referential style. For The Loved One, he would incorporate everything he learned as a cutting-edge filmmaker in the UK. As a result, he purposefully mimicked fellow auteurs like Stanley Kubrick (along with borrowing Strangelove‘s look, he placed his comedic star, Jonathan Winters, in a diabolical dual role) and Orson Welles (playing with depth of field and focus). He would also take pot shots at several ‘–isms’ — racism, materialism, populism, commercialism — while keeping the more macabre elements about the recently deceased front and center. Thus we have the surreal story of a bad boy British poet who falls in love with a maudlin make-up girl at a ritzy, regal funeral home.

Gibon is apparently referring to the “noirish” black & white format of Kubrick’s film as well as Peters Sellers’ multiple roles. He then summarizes the plot, which I think from memory he gets a bit wrong when he has Dennis Barlow take up his job at the Happy Hunting Ground after the death and funeral of Francis Hinsley (although such a plot change may well have been included and would fit in with the film script’s many other wholesale alterations in Waugh’s story). He then continues:

While the film’s narrative barely resembled Waugh’s wicked work, The Loved One stands on its own as an eccentric celluloid experiment from the equally innovative mid-’60s. In many ways, it resembles a series of Monty Python sketches as directed by David Lynch, a decidedly deadpan farce that uses corpses instead of conceptualization as the source of its humor. While much of the original outrage will fall flat on audiences raised on our current post-modern sense of mockery, there is still a great deal to enjoy in this early attempt at directorial dadaism.[…]

Sadly, he didn’t have the support of a Godard or a Truffaut, meaning he often took on projects that dampened his anarchic approach. With The Loved One, however, he found a near perfect vehicle. Within the incredibly unusual setting, he could ridicule the Establishment (as illustrated by the racially selective Whispering Glade’s mortuary) while tweaking the counterculture for its lack of originality (Barlow’s poetry is all borrowed from the classics) and conviction (Aimee is a flower child who rather deal in death than reality). Indeed, it could be said that this monochrome masterwork is on par with other examples of stellar ’60s cinema, losing most of its warped wit, but easily retaining all its aesthetically appealing aspects…

In the decade since this review was posted, the film version has, indeed, come to be accepted as a classic, with several reruns as such on the TCM channel.

A more recent BBC TV adaptation of Decline and Fall has been the subject of an Australian architectural article. This appears on the website ArchitectureAU.com and is written by Patrick Hunn. The article offers several indoor activities (such as TV bingeing) that might appeal to its readers as the height of Antipodean summer approaches:

If you can bear the mid-century droning of the English upper classes, you might begin your indoor television holiday with Decline and Fall, a BBC adaptation of an Evelyn Waugh novel featuring one Otto Friedrich Silenus, an unkind but entertaining Le Corbusier surrogate and a well-engineered manifestation of all that is distressing about the modernist architect archetype.

“Only factories are beautiful,” he hisses in one scene from behind a pair of thick round glasses, before arguing that humans impose an unacceptable mess on the perfection of his designs by demanding staircases for accessing the upper storeys of a building. “The tragedy for architects is that they have to have clients.”

This is a character that played a part in fostering the rather nasty generational understanding of architects as strange and aloof, and modernism as a cold, synthetic and unfriendly school of design, but it’s such a highly accomplished assassination of both architects and modernism that you find yourself willing to go along with it.

Share
Posted in Adaptations, Decline and Fall, Film, Television, The Loved One | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on A Tale of Two Adaptations

Waugh Lecture at Lancing

The Lancing College website has posted a report of last month’s Evelyn Waugh Lecture. This year’s speaker was OL Sir Tim Rice (1958-62) who recalled how events at Lancing had helped shape his career as a lyricist:

Tim admitted that […] good stories had always interested him (he first came across Eva PerĂłn in his stamp collection as a young boy) and spells in Lancing’s Chapel nurtured the material for Joseph and the Amazing Technicolor Dreamcoat and Jesus Christ Superstar. He closed with these words, “I think the ethos, the liberal spirit of the school, the fact that even insensitive souls such as myself dimly realised that there was more to education than exams and discipline, was a good basis for life. Of course it was privileged, of course it was a bubble of security, but when I return now, it’s impossible to feel that my time here was wasted. I am still lying on a bank in the sun in 1961, half-watching the cricket XI, half-listening to Del Shannon’s ‘Runaway’.”

Also present was Evelyn Waugh’s grandson Alexander Waugh. According to the website, this visit

coincided with his publication of The Complete Works of Evelyn Waugh, Volume 30, Personal Writings 1903-1921 Precocious Waughs. Evelyn was at Lancing from 1917-1921 and his most prolific year of diary writing occurred in 1920. His housemaster, John F Roxburgh wrote to him in October 1921 congratulating him on the quality of the school magazine (Waugh was editor) and observed rather astutely, “If you use what the gods have given you, you will do as much as any single person I can think of to shape the course of your own generation”.

The Complete Works are published by Oxford University Press. Alexander is General Editor of the project and editor of the Personal Writings volumes. The first volume in that series was published late last year, and this was the first Waugh Lecture to convene since that event.

Finally, the website reports arrangements have already been made for next year’s lecture:

The 2019 Evelyn Waugh Lecture will revert to its usual timing at the beginning of the summer term, on Thursday 25 April.  We are honoured to have the author, William Boyd as our guest speaker and it will be his first visit to Lancing. Ardent fans will recall that Evelyn Waugh had a role in William Boyd’s novel Any Human Heart (2002) and that he has also adapted Scoop for television (1988) and the Sword of Honour trilogy (2001).

There are also several photographs of the event posted on the website. Those are available at this link.

Share
Posted in Academia, Adaptations, Alexander Waugh, Complete Works, Evelyn Waugh, Lancing, Lectures, Scoop, Sword of Honour | Tagged , | Comments Off on Waugh Lecture at Lancing

The Waugh Before Christmas

–The Daily Mail includes Waugh in a Christmas quiz set by humorist Craig Brown. Here’s the question:

10) Match the Christmas with the participant:

a) ‘The presents I got were — as always — far inferior in every way to the ones I gave, that is annoying. The parties I went to didn’t have any nice young ladies at them, and everybody had a much smaller brain than mine.’

b) ‘The presence of my children affects me with deep weariness and depression. I do not see them until luncheon, as I have my breakfast alone in the library, and they are in fact well trained to avoid my part of the house; but I am aware of them from the moment I wake.’

c) ‘All my loathing of Christmas . . . poured over me during the walk home. All those ‘merry people’, windows open & awful noise of singing, and daft decorations everywhere & drunks and bad driving and just below the surface — the extreme rude bestiality.’

d) ‘Every year on Christmas day I like to tell my mother that I’m lesbian, even though I’m not. It just gets everything going.’

i) Jenny Eclair

ii) Kenneth Williams

iii) Kingsley Amis

iv) Evelyn Waugh

You will find the answer along with several other questions here.

–The Paris Review has an article by Katy Kelleher about the history and tradition surrounding the French liqueur Chartreuse and the color to which it has given a name. The potion was perfected in 1737 by a group of French monks who were given the recipe developed by an alchemist in the 16th century:

Over the years, they tweaked the recipe slightly, making it less alcoholic and more palatable to the general public. Then they began to sell it.  This worked fine for everyone involved until 1903, when the French government nationalized the Chartreuse distillery. They expelled the monks, who went to Spain and built a new distillery there. “The pre-expulsion stuff was much prized,” writes Henry Jeffreys for the Guardian. He was introduced to the drink by his “louche uncle.” As Jeffreys relays, the joys of the original version were sung in Evelyn Waugh’s Brideshead Revisited. “There are five distinct tastes as it trickles over the tongue,” Anthony Blanche, Waugh’s stuttering gentleman, says. “It’s like swallowing a sp-spectrum.”

Deborah Mitford in her memoirs Wait for Me remembers another Waugh connection with this particular libation. This occurred at her first meeting Waugh at a Christmas party of her friend Daphne Weymouth (later Fielding) in 1942:

One night he poured a bottle of Green Chartreuse over his head and, rubbing it into his hair, he intoned: “My hair is covered in gum; my hair is  covered in gum,” as the sticky mess ran down his neck. (p. 123)

Waugh, then stationed at Sherborne on a training course, wrote to his wife about the party. He mentions meeting Deborah Mitford but not the self-dousing with Chartreuse (Letters, 164). One can only wonder whether Waugh remembered that occasion when he wrote Anthony Blanche’s description 2 years later.

THE has an interview with Tereza TopolovskĂĄ, lecturer in Eng. Lang. & Lit. at Charles University in Prague. This is about her new book The Country House Revisited: Variations on a Theme from Forster to Hollinghurst in which she mentions Waugh’s contribution:

Your new book explores the theme of the country house in English literature. Which books spurred your interest in the theme?

Originally, I was drawn to the more generic theme of houses in English literature and therefore analysed mainly the works of John Galsworthy, E. M. Forster and Simon Mawer, where I approached the houses as symbols, settings and subject matters. After having read some of the must-reads of country-house fiction – Evelyn Waugh’s Brideshead Revisited and A Handful of Dust, Galsworthy’s The Country House, Forster’s Howards End – I noticed a repetitive pattern of a house embracing some aspects of a communal paradigm: the country house. I widened the scope of my study and included uncharacteristic examples of fictional houses, such as Shruff End in Iris Murdoch’s The Sea, The Sea. Last but not least, I was intrigued by the sumptuous evocation of the splendid ugliness of the houses in Ian McEwan’s Atonement or Alan Hollinghurst’s The Stranger’s Child, and the aesthetic of inevitable decline in Sarah Waters’ gothic The Little Stranger.

–Finally, BBC has, according to an LGBT entertainment site, scheduled a Christmas treat (or not, as the case may be) for Waugh fans. This is a rebroadcast of the 2008 theatrical film adaptation of Brideshead Revisited, co-produced by the BBC with Miramax and Ecosse Films. This will be transmitted by BBC2 on Friday, 28 December 2018, at 1425p London time.

 

 

Share
Posted in A Handful of Dust, Academia, Adaptations, Brideshead Revisited, Evelyn Waugh, Film, Interviews, Letters, Newspapers | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on The Waugh Before Christmas

Pre-Christmas Roundup

The Financial Times has a review of a new book about country houses that opens with this reference to Evelyn Waugh who was something of an expert on the subject:

Evelyn Waugh wrote Brideshead Revisited in the early 1940s as a requiem for “the atmosphere of a better age”, one that celebrated the rituals of the English country house. In retrospect, Waugh realised that his lament was premature because the country house proved more resilient than he imagined. Indeed, great houses reinvented themselves in the second half of the 20th century, either by becoming more entrepreneurial, like Woburn and Longleat, or by being rescued through the efforts of the National Trust and the Heritage Lottery Fund, like Kedleston Hall and Calke Abbey.

The book is by  David Cannadine and Jeremy Musson and is entitled The Country House: Past, Present, Future,

In another reference to Brideshead, an article in Country Life magazine by Annunciata Elwes lists her 6 favorite nannies in literature. Among them is Nanny Hawkins:

‘Nanny did not particularly like to be talked to. She liked visitors best when they paid no attention to her and let her knit away, and watch their faces and think of them as she had known them as small children; their present goings-on did not signify much beside those early illnesses and crimes.’ Generally adored and sporadically visited in her quarters at Brideshead, this sweet figure is a symbol of lost innocence for the grown-up Flyte children of Evelyn Waugh’s Brideshead Revisited.

Others listed include Mary Poppins and Madame Doubtfire.

The Independent has a story by Martin Chilton on the rather unhappy background of the film Chitty Chitty Bang Bang which celebrates its 50th anniversary this year. The story begins with the book  on which the film was based:

In April 1961, Ian Fleming, who was a heavy smoker and drinker, had a heart attack at the age of 53 and was ordered to convalesce. It was around this time that his eight-year-old son Caspar told him: “Daddy, you love James Bond more than you love me!” The author decided to show his affection for his only child – whom he nicknamed “003-and-a-half” – by writing in longhand a series of children’s stories he first called The Magical Car.

Fleming’s tales were about a flying car restored by Caractacus Potts, an inventor and retired naval commander. The title was later changed to Chitty-Chitty-Bang-Bang, which was based on the real cars Chitty-Bang-Bang 1, 2, 3 and 4 built by the eccentric motor enthusiast Louis Zborowski in the 1920s.

Fleming suffered another heart attack on 11 August 1964, following a long lunch at Royal St George’s Golf Club in Kent. He died the next morning, on his son’s 12th birthday. Fleming never got to see the printed versions of his children’s stories, which came out in October that year.

The death affected his son deeply (“Caspar hates me and talks of little but matricide. What shall I do?” his mother Ann wrote to novelist Evelyn Waugh). On 2 October 1975, aged just 23, Caspar committed suicide, taking an overdose of barbiturates at his mother’s home in Chelsea. A forlorn note in his pyjama pocket read: “If it is not this time it will be the next.”

 

 

Share
Posted in Anniversaries, Brideshead Revisited, Newspapers | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Pre-Christmas Roundup

Waugh on BBC Radio 4 Great Lives

The BBC Radio 4 episode of its “Great Lives” series is now available to monitor on BBC iPlayer. Presenter Matthew Parris spent most most of the broadcast baiting panelists Russell Kane and Anne Pasternak Slater by citing examples of Waugh’s bad behavior. Parris went so far as to claim that he could not read Waugh’s books, even though conceding they were brilliantly written, because Waugh himself was such a horrible person. Kane and Pasternak Slater were at pains to explain that much of Waugh’s behavior was an act, intended to generate attention and promote his career, and should not be taken too seriously. I would have to say that the pro-Waugh camp got the better of it. Indeed, Parris’s position rather proved their point.

Share
Posted in Discussions, Evelyn Waugh, Radio Programs | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Waugh on BBC Radio 4 Great Lives

Music of Time

The BBC has undertaken a review of classical music composed in the years 1918-2018. This is entitled “Our Classical Century” and includes recorded performances and commentary on both television (BBC4) and radio (BBC Radio 3). Selections will also be featured in next year’s edition of the BBC Proms. In the program announcement for the Radio 3 portion, there are links to five musical pieces considered of particular “popular” interest. Among these is the composition Facade in which William Walton set to music some poems of Edith Sitwell:

The first [public] performance of Façade, by William Walton and Edith Sitwell, took place on 12 June 1923 in the grand setting of London’s Aeolian Hall. Unusually, the event wasn’t billed as a concert, but as an “entertainment” for six instruments and reciter. Walton, a gifted composer, was a hit with the bright young things of 1920s London. He had been all but adopted by the aristocratic Edith Sitwell and her brothers, Osbert and Sacheverell, who persuaded the reluctant Walton to set Edith’s poems to music.

On the night of the first performance, Sitwell spoke her lines through a “sengerfone”, a decorated megaphone that protruded through a monstrous face painted on a screen (a staging decision that was as practical as it was dramatic; it meant that she could be heard above the instruments). The music itself was a fizzing mix of sophisticated jazzy modernism and music hall parody, with masses of quotations thrown in.

Evelyn Waugh and Virginia Woolf were among the first dazed audience members, while Noel Coward was so disgusted that he walked out in the middle. The reviews were mixed. While one headline denounced Façade as “drivel that they paid to hear”, a more thoughtful critic wrote:”As a musical joker, [Walton] is a jewel of the first water’.

Waugh was still a student at Oxford at the time of this performance to which he was taken (if memory serves) by his friend Harold Acton. It is unlikely that he enjoyed it because, as he later explained, he found music (or at least classical music) painful to listen to. He said as much to Igor Stravinsky when declining a personal invitation to the premiere of that composer’s Requiem in the late 1940s. He does, however, appear to have enjoyed musical comedies and went to repeat performances of both The Beggar’s Opera in the 1920s and Kiss Me Kate (music and lyrics by Cole Porter based on Shakespeare’s The Taming of the Shrew) in the 1950s. Whether either of those will appear in the BBC’s musical series is not known.

The Daily Mail has published a brief article by Patricia Nicol on what to read in the current season of party going:

Evelyn Waugh’s pitch-black inter-war ‘party novel’ Vile Bodies chronicled the debauched antics of Britain’s aristocratic Bright Young Things. Wild child Agatha Runcible dies after hosting a cocktail party in the nursery home where she has been sent to rest and recuperate. Therein lies a warning. Partying, like everything else, is best in season. Out of season, rest up.

The other recommended novel is Jay McInerney’s Bright Lights, Big City set in the 1980s.

Finally, in a recent review of the US edition of Hilary Spurling’s biography of Waugh’s friend and fellow novelist Anthony Powell, author Christopher Sandford writes this in Modern Age: A Conservative Journal:

…Apart from turning out a stream of increasingly free-form reviews and memoirs, Powell found himself at the age of eighty-four at the center of one of those explosive literary feuds the English seem to do almost as well as their  national genius for the political sex scandal. His adversary was Evelyn Waugh’s eldest son, Auberon, who published a damning review of Powell’s latest volume of memoirs in the Sunday Telegraph, a paper to which they were both long-time contributors. Running as a subplot there was also the fact that Powell seemed to some to have lived his professional life in Evelyn Waugh’s shadow: never quite attaining the same level of success that Brideshead Revisited, in particular, brought to Waugh in the U.S., although by the same token scrupulously avoiding that book’s prevalent tone of narcissism and Roman Catholic proselytizing. Powell was simply too honorable to be a publicist for himself or indeed any other cause. His diaries cannot be read, as the elder Waugh’s can be, for their joyful cascade of indiscretions. When Waugh died at the age of sixty-three in 1966, Powell wrote merely that his friend had made a “great performance” of his life. By contrast, “I have absolutely no picture of myself,” Powell said. “Never have had.”

Spurling glides over the whole Sunday Telegraph incident by taking what could be called the psychological approach. The younger Waugh, she writes, had himself published an autobiography, “contain[ing] a scary portrait of Evelyn as a monstrous egoist who regarded all his sons, and this one in particular, as rivals to be snubbed, derided and put down. Even in his own distress, Powell regarded young Auberon’s response as essentially vicarious, the vengeful product of a largely loveless childhood.”

Be that as it may, Powell went ballistic over Auberon’s review, severing his relations with the Telegraph, which rather bizarrely commissioned a bust of their departing Ă©minence grise but then found they had nowhere to put it. It perched for a while on an office filing cabinet. The Powells and the Waughs never spoke again. It all could have been a scene from one of those darkly funny contemplations of the London literary world taken from Books Do Furnish a Room, the best individual installment of the Dance to the Music of Time.

It was a collection of Powell’s literary reviews, Miscellaneous Verdicts, not his memoirs that Auberon reviewed unfavorably in the Sunday Telegraph, and Powell reviewed for the weekday edition, not the Sunday. Whether the Powells and “the Waughs” never spoke again seems rather a moot point since both Evelyn Waugh and his wife Laura were dead by the time this dispute took place, although it does seem unlikely that they ever spoke again to Auberon who outlived Anthony Powell by a few months. The feud, such as it was, has not been carried into younger generations, as witnessed by Alexander Waugh’s lecture to the Anthony Powell Society last year.

UPDATE (11 December 2018): Sentence added to final paragraph.

Share
Posted in Auberon Waugh, Brideshead Revisited, Evelyn Waugh, Newspapers, Radio Programs, Vile Bodies | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Music of Time

Roundup: Black Shorts and Literate Oenophiles

–Writing in America: The Jesuit Review, Rob Weinert-Kendt, journalist and editor of the American Theatre magazine, recalls how his life has been shaped by his reading and viewing of Brideshead Revisited as a teenager. He begins by putting the story in historical perspective:

…I realized something startling about “Brideshead” as I rewatched and reread it recently: More years have now elapsed since the series aired (37) than passed between the novel’s publication in 1945 and the creation of the series in 1981 (36). That doesn’t just make me feel old; it also happens to refract the last century in a sobering and clarifying new light. Waugh’s novel takes much of its animating energy from the death-haunted abandon of the Jazz Age years, between the grim bookends of World Wars I and II, when he was a giddy young Oxfordian. The intervening years between the novel and the series, though ostensibly chilled by the Cold War, witnessed the cultural revolution of the 1960s, then the retrenchment represented by Thatcher and Reagan, into which the apparent aristocratic nostalgia of the “Brideshead” series sailed with perfect timing.

He goes on to explain how Brideshead influenced his decision to have his parents send him to a Jesuit prep school where, although he was and remains a Protestant, he was turned

…from a class-obsessed preppy into something of a left-leaning, redistributionist hippie. My faith would weather more challenges in adulthood, but by the time I left Brophy [his Jesuit prep school] it was as strong and deep as an 18-year-old’s faith can be; at last rooted in something more enduring than an argyle sweater, it had blossomed accordingly. But there is no denying that superficial material attractions are what had lured me into the realm of the selfless and the spiritual, and planted at least a part of me there forever. (I won’t dwell here on the irony that Waugh, a notoriously conservative crank, would be mortified by the socially liberal form my religion has taken.)

He wonders what effect Brideshead may have on today’s younger generation and supposes that “contemporary readers may simply not find as much to grab them in the social history of between-the-wars England.” But he concludes that to worry about this is “to miss the point the book is making, and certainly made in my life: Earthly delights are but a foretaste of the feast to come. As St. Augustine wrote: ‘Late have I loved thee, O beauty so ancient and so new.’ In contemporary parlance: Better late than never.

–In the Guardian, Ian Sansom reviews a book by Ben Schott in which he revisits the Wodehousian world of Bertie Wooster. This is Jeeves and the King of Clubs. The review opens with this:

According to Evelyn Waugh, “Mr Wodehouse’s idyllic world can never stale. He will continue to release future generations from captivity that may be more irksome than our own.” He has certainly continued to release future generations from the irksome captivity of writing as themselves. Following in what he calls “the patent-leather footsteps of the greatest humorist in the English language”, Ben Schott of the Schott’s Miscellanies fame has written a homage to everyone’s favourite Wodehouse creations, Jeeves and Wooster. (He’s not the first: Sebastian Faulks had a go in 2013, in Jeeves and the Wedding Bells.) The book, we are told, is “Authorised by the PG Wodehouse Estate”, which is certainly reassuring – but is it any good? The stakes are high. Fond pastiche or parody? A novel or a novelty?

The review continues by summarizing a plot which should resonate with Wodehouse lovers. It revolves around a right wing political group called the “Black Shorts” which sounds like a good start. The Waugh quote comes from a 1961 BBC Home Service broadcast, reprinted in the Sunday Times (16 July 1961) as “An Act of Homage and Reparation to P G Wodehouse.” EAR, p. 561.

–In a Guardian opinion article, Marina Hyde is reminded by the current mind-numbing Brexit scandal of a previous British political crisis as it was described by Waugh:

For some, Brexit is so unwatchable that it has passed through the looking glass and is now obsessively watchable. There is a definite strand in the British temperament that does enjoy a good constitutional crisis. In a 1936 diary entry [p. 415], Evelyn Waugh wrote of the abdication drama: “The Simpson crisis has been a great delight to everyone. At Maidie’s nursing home they report a pronounced turn for the better in all adult patients. There can seldom have been an event that has caused so much general delight and so little pain.” If only the Brexit crisis were as victimless an event. The Wallis Simpson affair was clearly a net benefit for the nation (plus a good 25% on the share price for Cartier).

–Finally, returning to Brideshead, novelist Jay McInerney includes that novel on a Literary Hub list of 8 novels for the literate oenophile:

There are many reasons to love this uncharacteristically romantic novel by Waugh, including the delirious wine commentary of its protagonists Charles Ryder and Sebastian Flyte who spend an idyllic summer trying to drain the wine cellar at Sebastian’s ancestral castle and inventing ways to describe it.

“It’s a little shy wine like a gazelle.”
“Like a leprechaun.”
“and this is a wise old wine.”
“A prophet in a cave.”
“And this is a necklace of pearls on a white neck.”
“Like a white swan.”

And more ominously, there is this exchange:

“Ought we to be drunk every night,” Sebastian asked one morning. “Yes, I think so.”

“I think so too.”

Share
Posted in Brideshead Revisited, Diaries, Evelyn Waugh | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Roundup: Black Shorts and Literate Oenophiles

Waugh Event at Gloucestershire Festival

The Chipping Campden Literary Festival has issued preliminary information about its 2019 program. This is scheduled for 7-11 May 2019 and will include an event on 10 May entitled “Scoop: We Need to Talk About Waugh”. This will be presented by two Waugh biographers, Martin Stannard and Duncan McLaren. More details will be provided as they become available.

Share
Posted in Evelyn Waugh, Festivals, Scoop | Tagged | Comments Off on Waugh Event at Gloucestershire Festival

Tatler Reopens U/Non-U Debate

A recent feature article in Tatler magazine reopens the ever popular discussion of English social class markers usually referred to as the U/Non-U debate originally sparked by an article by Nancy Mitford. This latest discussion is by Matthew Bell. Here is an excerpt:

[Mitford’s] article, published in the CIA-funded magazine, Encounter, provoked an outcry, not least from her old friend Evelyn Waugh. In an open letter denouncing her for lobbing this grenade into British society, he wrote: ‘There are subjects too intimate for print. Surely class is one?’

Reading Mitford’s essay now, you realise how quickly everything changes. Back then, her observations on class were based on language – whether you ‘took a bath’ (non-U) or ‘had one’s bath’ (U). Whether you said ‘chimneypiece’ (U) or ‘mantelpiece’ (non-U). Today, having a bathtub at all is a sign of leisure, and therefore U (showers being much more common in every sense), while having a fireplace has become similarly recherchĂ© – and therefore U – in an age of remotely controlled central heating. Of course it was all tongue-in-cheek, a big old tease on the petit bourgeois. […]

A complicating factor in modern U-usage is that for years it has been cool not to be U. Sixty years of rock stars and Hollywood actors dominating the scene means nobody wants to seem upper class, even if they are. So being U has evolved to mean other things. It is about taste, and style, and culture. About being aware of the myriad nuances detectable in how people speak and interact and behave. That’s not always easy: while shibboleths such as ‘shoes have laces’ and ‘motorcars are black’, as one Chairman of the Stock Exchange insisted, have been gladly tossed aside, and even such guardians of correct form as 5 Hertford Street now accepts jeans – as long as they’re not ripped. And the hoodied figure ahead of you in the check-in queue is as likely to be the groovy young Viscount Loamshire of Waugh’s novels as he is to be a disruptive tech billionaire.

Here are a few pairings from Tatler’s new glossary of U/Non-U useages and practices:

New U/Non-U

Eating bread/Dietary requirements

Taking a centrist view/Jacob Rees Mogg

Champagne/Most white wine

EasyJet/British Airways

The North/The South-East

Loving your parents/Being friends with your parents

Knowing about plants/Knowing about yachts

Waugh’s comments on Mitford’s article (in the form of an “Open Letter” to Mitford) also appeared in a later issue of Encounter. Both were included in a collection of essays on the subject edited by Mitford: Noblesse Oblige (1956); and Waugh’s “Open Letter” is collected in EAR. Loamshire is a fictional county mentioned by Waugh in Put Out More Flags and Men at Arms, but the Viscount from that district may be a Tatler creation. Another revival of this discussion in TLS a few months ago drove up the price of Mitford’s essay collection in the internet secondhand book market. See previous posts. Perhaps this one will lead to a reprint.

A Florida affiliate of the US TV network NBC recently posted a review by its Culture Critic Michael Langan of the collected Letters of Nancy Mitford and Evelyn Waugh (1996). After a brief summary of the life and works of both writers he described their letters:

Charlotte Mosley, Nancy Mitford’s niece, daughter of Diana, has edited all this business. She is an absolutely wonderful editor. Mosley does what almost no one does anymore: She places beautifully clear footnotes on the page of the text that one is actually reading, rather than dropping them into the bowels of the endpaper somewhere, where one needs a flashlight to find them. […]

The letters are very brittle at times. Both writers were accomplished satirists in their own right, able to snap one’s head off with a single slight. […] By the end of their correspondence, in 1965, ennui had taken over. Waugh wrote: “Darling Nancy, It was very nice to hear from you. I have not written because the last 10 months have been ineffably dreary — my only excursions to dentist and funerals and my house perpetually full of grandchildren.”

 

Share
Posted in Evelyn Waugh, Letters, Men at Arms, Newspapers, Put Out More Flags, Television Programs | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Tatler Reopens U/Non-U Debate