TV Series Previewed: Like Trainspotting Written by Evelyn Waugh

The Sunday Times has an interview of Benedict Cumberbatch and a preview of his new Patrick Melrose TV series. Cumberbatch both produced the series and plays the leading role. The books  were adapted for TV by David Nicholls who previously adapted his own novels One Day and Starter for Ten as well as the 2015 film version of Hardy’s Far from the Madding Crowd. According to Stephen Armstrong for the Times:

The Patrick Melrose series of novels — Edward St Aubyn’s epic, cuttingly witty family saga of abuse, addiction and redemption that reads like Evelyn Waugh writing Trainspotting — has been a cult favourite since the 1992 publication of Never Mind. The five volumes are thinly disguised autobiography: St Aubyn, a minor aristocrat and former junkie, was repeatedly raped by his father when he was a child. Readers are often recommended the novels, avoid them for a while, dip in and rapidly become obsessive fans. … For those unfamiliar with the novels, news that Sky had commissioned a series based on five dark books about abusive and decadent minor aristocracy might have seemed slightly surprising. Is Brideshead Revisited really improved by backstreet drug deals and savage torture? For those who know and love Melrose, however, there was a sharp dread akin to news that a relative was in mortal danger. Melrose fans are protective of Patrick. They don’t want anyone else to hurt him or do him wrong. And Cumberbatch should know — he’s as devoted as the best of them.

The series begins in the USA on the Showtime cable network (Saturday, 12 May 9pm) and in the UK on Sky Atlantic (Sunday, 13 May at 9pm) and will be available for streaming in both markets thereafter. There will be five one-hour episodes, one for each of the novels. The primary change for the adaptation will be to switch the order for books 1 (Never Mind) and 2 (Bad News) so that Patrick’s dealing with the death of his father will come before a flashback to his traumatic childhood.

Earlier TV adaptations are considered on the occasion of World Book Day (observed yesterday) by the New Zealand website stuff.co.nz. This chooses the top 5 adaptations of novels for TV. Ranked number 1 was the 1981 Granada production of Brideshead Revisited:

Along with The Jewel in the Crown and Fortunes of War, this 1981 take on Evelyn Waugh’s novel was Sunday night appointment viewing in New Zealand in the 1980s.  The 11-part series turned Jeremy Irons and Anthony Andrews into household names and even caused public protests in this country when TVNZ decided to remove the sex scenes from one particular episode.

Others included Hannibal, the original House of Cards and the BBC’s Pride and Prejudice.

Finally, yesterday’s Cincinnati Enquirer has an op ed piece by Kenneth Craycraft on the importance of remembering the persecution in the 20th century Holocaust, citing Evelyn Waugh from Brideshead Revisited on the subject of memory:

…failing to remember events like the Holocaust is not a tragedy only because of what it might cause (or fail to prevent) in the future. Rather, a failure of memory of the Holocaust and similar events is a tragedy because of what is says about us in the present. In his great novel, Brideshead Revisited, Evelyn Waugh says through the narrator and main character, “My theme is memory, that winged host that soared about me one grey morning of war-time. These memories, which are my life – for we possess nothing certainly except the past – were always with me.” If it is true that we possess nothing certainly except the past (and I believe that it is), then if we do not possess that past, we possess nothing. And if we possess nothing, we stop being moral beings, capable of authentic reflection, and choice. Our inability, or refusal, to remember compromises our capacity to make moral choices. Put another way, remembering is a moral act, and memory is a moral function.

UPDATE (14 May 2018): Emily Temple, writing in the Literary Hub, offers another comparison of Waugh and St Aubyn. She thinks St Aubyn’s Melrose novels are “a deft mash-up of the English social novel and what I suppose is best described as the recovery memoir, something like Evelyn Waugh by way of William S. Burroughs, but with a rather lighter touch than either.

 

Share
Posted in Adaptations, Brideshead Revisited, Evelyn Waugh, Interviews, Newspapers, Television | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on TV Series Previewed: Like Trainspotting Written by Evelyn Waugh

U and Non-U in TLS

The U and Non-U debate about social class distinctions that raged (if that’s the correct word) in the 1950s has resurfaced in the TLS. This appears in its N.B. column that is written by J. C. (believed to be James Campbell). It began with the March 20 column (“Blue Plaque blues”) in which the columnist mentions his purchase of the 1969 book entitled What Are U ? during one of his bookish perambulations. He describes this as the “little-known follow up (‘sequel’ is hideously non-U) to Nancy Mitford’s Noblesse Oblige which contains her ‘Inquiry into the Identifiable Characteristics of the English Aristocracy.'”  That was published in 1955. The follow-up is edited by Professsor Alan S. C. Ross, who wrote the essay that started Mitford on her campaign.  J. C. runs some of the examples from the 1969 book against today’s useage and concludes:

It requires only a short time spent with What Are U? to make every step treacherous. Do we say ‘paid’ £3 for it on our perambulation, or ‘were charged’ £3? Where would Ross stand on ‘stumped up’ ? It should be a useful–we just stopped ourselves saying U-seful: puns are non-U–investment.

Does he have any qualms, one wonders, about the useage of “perambulation”?

In last week’s TLS,  J.C. writes about a copy of the original book edited by Mitford and found on a subsequent perambulation, forking over (if he’ll excuse the expression) another £3. This is described as a “survivor from the aristocracy of Penguin production, fifty years old, sturdy and companionable.” A copy of the cover with a drawing by Osbert Lancaster accompanies the article.  In that regard, J.C. notes that, in this earlier iteration, Mitford has “roped in Evelyn Waugh and John Betjeman, with Osbert Lancaster illustrating (the couple here are seen reading Noblesse Oblige).” See link. Waugh’s contribution is reprinted in Essays, Articles and Reviews.

Perhaps we can look forward to yet another column when J.C. finds a copy of the 1978 book edited by Richard Buckle, entitled U and Non-U Revisited and published by Debrett’s. This contains a symposium in which Professor Ross appears as well as articles by, inter alia, Christopher Sykes (who also wrote an essay for the 1955 original) and Diana Mitford (apparently as stand-in for her sister Nancy). Are there yet others to be found ?

These articles are not available without a subscription. The cover illustrations, however, are linked above. Thanks to reader Peggy Troupin for calling these to our attention.

Share
Posted in Academia, Discussions, Essays, Articles & Reviews, Newspapers | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

From Anatolia to Catalonia

A Turkish website which looks like a promotional books blog (okuryazar.tv) has posted a brief introduction and excerpt from the Turkish translation of A Handful of Dust (in Turkish Bir Avuç Toz). After a plot summary, the introduction continues:

A Handful of Dust, a unique blend of tragedy, comedy and grimace, is [considered] … one of the most important novels of the century by leading critics such as Frank Kermode and Alexander Woollcott. “Evelyn Waugh examines the problems of an alienated generation, describing the veiled barbarism that comes from the unraveling of bonds that hold society and isolated individuals together.” We present Chapter 1 from A Handful of Dust.

From the other end of the Mediterreanean, a print/online Catalan language newspaper published in the Balearic Islands (arabalears.cat) has an article by Marina P. De Cabo about fictional journalists. This opens:

From the irony of the pen of Oscar Wilde, who wrote that the difference between literature and journalism is that “journalism is unreadable and literature is unread”, to the not always reliable honesty of Ryszard Kapuscinski, who described journalism as a wonderful school of life, via the point of view of the poet Roger Wolfe, who, referring to the profession, advises: “Launch the shit and wash your hands”: there are numerous authors who have pronounced on the profession, and not few fictional characters that have exercised it. Nothing is farther from the intent of this article than to establish an indefinable canon of reporters created through the written word. The intention is more toward offering a taste of imaginary journalists to outline the ways in which literature has focused on the vocation. As a true reflection of reality, there are some ethical and corrupt and vicious ones. What is offered is not exhaustive but a good representation.

After discussing such fictional journalists as Henrietta Stackpole (from Henry James’ Portrait of  a Lady) and the cartoon strip characters Tintin and Lois Lane, this Waugh creation is offered:

Lord Copper. The plot of the novel “Noticia bomba!”[Scoop], one of the most celebrated works by the British writer Evelyn Waugh, deals with irony, not without criticism of the journalistic issue. The narration centers on a terrible confusion: they send the wrong person to cover the war of Ishmailia; Instead of a famous novelist, the assignment is given to a columnist specializing in nature stories. From that point on, fun is assured. The work is based on the author’s work experience, specifically on the work he did to cover the invasion of Abyssinia by Mussolini.

The list continues with several other examples, including novelist Richard Ford’s Frank Bascombe and cartoon character Brenda Starr. The translations are by Google with edits.

 

 

 

Share
Posted in A Handful of Dust, Evelyn Waugh, Newspapers, Scoop | Tagged , , | Comments Off on From Anatolia to Catalonia

Roundup: Waugh in Publishing

Amazon is offering a new book by London-based playwright and singer-songwriter Roy Smiles. This is entitled Waugh in Winter and is the text of a play which is built around Waugh’s persona. According to the book description:

Waugh in Winter is a piece about Evelyn Waugh, the acerbic right-wing author of Brideshead Revisited. A supposed BBC interviewer from Woman’s Hour has come to interview ‘the cultural dinosaur’. What begins as a useful ploy by Waugh to taunt and sneer at a woman of a lower class becomes an examination of his frightful snobbery and hatred of womankind. This stems from the love and rejection of his first wife ‘She Evelyn’ who haunts his memory whilst reminding him of the decent and loving man he once was.

Smiles has published several books of plays based on biographies of well-known subjects. These include other writers such as P G Wodehouse (Plum), George Orwell (Year of the Rat) and Arthur Miller (Reno). Among the successful productions of his biographical plays, Wikipedia includes Kurt & Sid (Cobain and Vicious, West End, 2009), Schmucks (Groucho Marx and Lenny Bruce, debut, Battersea, 1992) and Ying Tong–A Walk with the Goons (Spike Milligan’s nervous breakdown, Yorkshire to West End, 2004). Smiles has also self-published several albums of his songs. Waugh in Winter will be released next week as a Kindle book. It will, in addition, be included in a collection of 10 of his plays,  also to be released next week

The Chicago Review Press has announced the reprint earlier this month of Elsa Lanchester’s autobiography Herself. This was originally published in 1983 and includes Lanchester’s brief memoir of Evelyn Waugh. He was a regular punter at her night club the Cave of Harmony. She recalls him as: “not at all attractive looking. Not very tall, he had a pink face. That is, not all over pink, pink in patches as if he had a bad cold.”  She also recalls her role in the Greenidge-Waugh film production of The Scarlet Woman: “…I was the woman…The film was awful though we laughed hysterically.” While she is somewhat dismissive about the film, Robert M Davis says that it was her debut as a film actress. She and Waugh also had the identical birth date: “he said to the hour.” Waugh mentions her several times in his diaries for 1924 (e.g., pp. 167, 170) both in connection with visits to the night club and the making of the film. During the filming, he entertained Elsa and some friends at what became a rather drunken and extravagant dinner (£4) followed by several stops for drinks. He recalls that, at a flat on Great Ormond Street where the party ended up, he “fought [with her] all over the floor for a pound note which eventually became destroyed.” She went on to marry actor Charles Laughton and moved to Hollywood where she starred in several films, including Bride of Frankenstein (1935). Waugh doesn’t mention meeting her when he traveled to Los Angeles in 1947.

Waugh’s French publishers (Editions Robert Laffont) have reissued several of his books recently. One of these (Une poignée de cendresA Handful of Dust) was featured prominently in the French books blog Dans le manoir aux livres:

…One of the favorite themes of the author is the decline of the British aristocracy. This is therefore naturally and unsurprisingly present here. Evelyn Waugh takes pleasure in scratching this social category. Behind the varnish of appearances, the disintegration of the aristocracy has real consequences for its youngest, quickly lost and unmarked members that we follow between England and the Amazon. The characters are not spared by the caustic spirit of their creator. Indeed, Evelyn Waugh does not shelter them and shows a rather frightening cruelty towards them. Unfortunately, this makes them quite elusive…A Handful of Dust is a rather special novel between satire, a certain realism and a cruelty towards rather elusive characters… (Translation by Google with minor edits.)

Other books reissued in French by Laffont since the first of this year include Le cher disparu (The Loved One), Hommes en armes (Men at Arms) and Scoop.

The Irish Times has an article in which it publishes reactions of several other writers and scholars to a claim made earlier this year by Irish novelist James Kelman in a St Patrick’s Day interview with the paper:

…[Kelman] criticised Irish writers for failing to reflect on the country’s colonial experience and their unwillingness to break with convention and challenge authority, thus benefiting, he claimed, from cushy careers in London and New York.

Professor Jim Smyth of the University of Notre Dame, calling on Evelyn Waugh, offered a partial defense of Kelman’s position:

…. In the 20th century, unionist Scotland had a somewhat more robust left-wing politics than rebel Ireland, nurtured by one account in the rich civic loam of the Scottish “democratic intellect”. Revolutionary Ireland was instructed “Labour Must Wait” and it is waiting still. Where is the fierce indignation about social injustice, and the housing and healthcare crises, to be found amid all the neo-liberal platitudes about “business confidence” and “innovation” recycled daily on the airwaves, online and in print? I write as a keen admirer of the High Tory, Evelyn Waugh, not as an advocate of socialist realism. It seems likely too that Kelman is deprecating complacency about our present discontents, not calling for more political soapbox novels. He exaggerates to be sure, but as Waugh’s Mr Salter might say “only up to a point”.

Finally, the magazine Town & Country has published a collection of 20 quotations that are intended to remind its readers that summer is almost here. One of these comes from Brideshead Revisited:

11. ” If it could only be like this always – always summer, always alone, the fruit always ripe…” -Evelyn Waugh

 

 

Share
Posted in A Handful of Dust, Books about Evelyn Waugh, Brideshead Revisited, Diaries, Men at Arms, Scoop, The Loved One | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Roundup: Waugh in Publishing

Long-Missing Waugh Letter for Sale

Peter Harrington Booksellers are offering the original of a 24 January 1958 letter from Evelyn Waugh to Nancy Mitford. The letter was published in full in the Christopher Sykes biography (Penguin, p. 525) but had gone missing when Charlotte Mosley was compiling the correspondence between Waugh and Mitford. She published what she described as “extracts” quoted by Sykes (NMEW, p. 409), but in fact it was the complete letter, as Sykes himself explained.

The contents of the letter are well known and provide Waugh’s opinionated assessment of Brian Howard’s carreer on the occasion of his suicide, as well as Waugh’s difference of opinion with the obituary of Howard written by Alan Pryce-Jones in The Times. He also tells Mitford about his forthcoming trip to Rhodesia and notes that his life is insured on the journey for more that his estimated earnings for the remainder of his life.

The interesting question is where was this letter after Christopher Sykes quoted it? There were dozens of other letters from Waugh to Mitford which must have been supplied to Sykes from the same source–which Sykes cites (p.9) as Mitford herself who died in 1973 while he was writing his book–and they were also mostly available to Mosley for her volume. Why did this one letter go astray and who is now offering it for sale? At this point that is a more interesting tale than the contents of the letter that have already been published twice. The asking price is £7,500.

Share
Posted in Biographies, Evelyn Waugh, Items for Sale, Letters | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Long-Missing Waugh Letter for Sale

Brexit, Flags and Travesties

Patrick Kidd in today’s issue of  The Times devotes his “Political Sketch” column to the Commonwealth Conference convened this week in London. He opens and closes with references to an Evelyn Waugh novel:

Put out more flags. Evelyn Waugh took the title of his 1942 novel from a Chinese epigram about how a drunk military man should “order gallons and put out more flags in order to increase his splendour”. Gloria in vexillis Deo, as the foreign secretary might say.

The flags were out all over London yesterday, around Parliament Square, up and down the Mall and standing upright at the back of the Buckingham Palace ballroom to honour the 53 countries attending the Commonwealth meeting. In Brexiting Britannia, these colourful cloths are more than just bunting. Each represents an opportunity for life after the EU, or so Theresa May hopes: 52 potential trade deals, 52 places where Liam Fox can be sent with a pen and a pleading look. Britain’s future is in flags. Or perhaps it’s just flaggin’.

Most of the column (entitled “Worth a flutter?”) is devoted to Justin Trudeau. Kidd notes, in this regard, Trudeau’s gaffes in English and fluency in French and closes with this:

It was light on detail but heavy on flags. Mr Trudeau spoke in front of a forest of nine red-and-white maple leafs. Following the Waugh rule, he must be in trouble back home.

In this week’s New Yorker, playwright Tom Stoppard is interviewed by Cynthia Zarin in connection with the revival of his 1974 play Travesties. This is set in 1917 Zurich and features James Joyce, Vladimir Lenin and the “Dadaist” Tristan Tzara. In discussing his career, Stoppard mentions how he got his start with some help from Waugh:

Stoppard left school at seventeen, and worked as a journalist, and then as a drama critic. (His pseudonym was William Boot, after the hero of Evelyn Waugh’s satirical novel “Scoop.”) While reporting for newspapers, he began writing plays for radio and the stage.

The article concludes with this insight into what may be the subject of Stoppard’s next play: “I don’t actively want to write about Brexit, but a play about Englishness would have to be about Brexit.”

Share
Posted in Evelyn Waugh, London, Newspapers, Put Out More Flags, Scoop | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Brexit, Flags and Travesties

Waugh Underground

The digital/print magazine Mental Floss has reposted a 2016 story about Waugh’s contribution to the successful HBO TV series from the early 2000’s entitled Six Feet Under. This told the stories of a family in the funeral business. According to the article by Roger Cormier:

Carolyn Strauss, then head programmer of HBO, wanted her network to do a show about death after watching the 1965 movie adaptation of Evelyn Waugh’s satirical book The Loved One, which was based on the Los Angeles funeral business.

The article then adds this additional factoid, which also recalls the inspiration of Waugh’s novel. The writer/producer Alan Ball:

“…purposely chose Los Angeles to set the series in because, in a show about death, why not set it in the world capital of the denial of death, which has got to be Los Angeles? Los Angeles is where you come to re-create yourself and to become immortal.”

Esquire magazine has a story which also relates to Waugh’s underground influence. This one deals with Dwight Gardner’s  memoir of his West Virginia coal miner grandfather, Archie:

He quickly rose to become a foreman. Later he branched out and in his spare time became a successful realtor. Archie had a big, bustling personality—he confronted each day as if it were a barn in need of raising. He was happier than most people. Maybe the fact that his own father had died young, in a car crash, gave him a sense that life is fleeting. He made the most of the best things in life and the least of the worst. Evelyn Waugh once wrote, “Instead of this absurd division into sexes they ought to class people as static and dynamic.” Archie was a dynamo. He wasn’t a sermonizer, but to be around him was to learn how to live. You picked up things. Some of the lessons he imparted were large and metaphysical, others minuscule and mundane.

The quote is from Decline and Fall and it is spoken by the ambitious German modernist architect Otto Silenus.

Finally, in a review of the BBC’s recent adaptation of E M Forster’s novel Howard’s End, a reviewer for the Jesuit magazine America made this comparison:

Howards End, E. M. Forster’s great 1910 novel, … was the basis for a perfect film adaptation in 1992 and for a smart, involving new series from the BBC, airing on the Starz cable network. The series is delivered in Sunday night installments that are bound to remind older, pre-binge-TV generations of their weekly dose of “Masterpiece Theatre” on PBS. (The show is now halfway through its four-part run.) Like Evelyn Waugh’s later classic, Brideshead Revisited, Forster’s is a state-of-the-nation thesis in the guise of a real estate inheritance plot, and the romantic affairs it traces signify deeper allegiances and betrayals.

In Waugh’s novel, religion replaced money as the driving force for the plot, although in both a large family house also played an important role.

 

Share
Posted in Adaptations, Brideshead Revisited, Decline and Fall, Newspapers, Television, The Loved One | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Waugh Underground

Message to Milligan

The following quote said to be taken from a volume of Letters of Note appeared recently in a Twitter post retweeted from 2015:

The comic Spike Milligan had great admiration for Evelyn Waugh. Whether this was reciprocated in any way must be in doubt. Once when passing Whites Club in St James, Milligan saw Waugh coming out and hastened to ask for his autograph, Waugh duly scribbled on a bit of paper and handed the result to Milligan who duly thanked him and went home. When he looked at what Waugh had written on the paper, it said, “Go away.”

Milligan (along with Peter Sellers and Harry Secombe) made his name on the BBC’s Goon Show in the 1950s. While it is doubtful Waugh was a fan, he was mentioned in at least one episode (“The Mighty Wurlitzer”, Series 6, Episode 16. First broadcast on January 3 1956):

Moriarty (Milligan):
… Now Seagoon, tell us, what is that fifty-ton brass-bound contraption you’re driving?

Seagoon (Secombe):
It’s a Wurlitzer.

Moriarty:
We thought it was a mirage.

Seagoon:
A mirage? I’ve never heard of that make. Ha ha!

Grytpype (Sellers):
Gad, what wit. You’re not the famous Evelyn Waugh, are you?

Seagoon:
Heavens no, I wasn’t born till 1918.

Waugh was keeping a diary at the time the episode was aired but doesn’t mention it. There may also be a Waugh reference in the episode “The Nasty Affair at the Burami Oasis” (Series 7, Episode 1. First broadcast on October 4, 1956).

Bloodnok (Sellers):
It’s a lie. It’s a lie! We’re just good friends I tell you! Get out the back way dear! Ohh! Mind the thunderbox will you? Oohhh!

Men at Arms appeared in 1952 and featured Apthorpe’s thunder box, but Milligan who wrote the series may well have known about those from his own army service. The Goon Show was a precursor to Monty Python which came a decade later but that was too late for Waugh.

 

Share
Posted in Evelyn Waugh, Humo(u)r, Men at Arms, Radio Programs, Twitter, World War II | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Craig Brown’s 100 Favorites

The Daily Mail has published a list of humorist Craig Brown’s 100 favorite books. He explains that these are not necesarily his picks for “greatest” books but those he most enjoyed reading and would recommend to a friend. It is roughly divided between fiction (including short story collections) and non-fiction. Nothing by Evelyn Waugh (nor by Graham Greene or Anthony Powell for that matter) is included but Waugh is mentioned as having been influenced by Saki’s short stories which is one of Brown’s choices.

In the diary section, Brown includes the Diaries of Auberon Waugh with this explanation:

Auberon Waugh’s fantasy diaries, published fortnightly in Private Eye from 1972 to 1985. They remain as outrageously comical today as they ever were – perhaps even more so as the passage of time has made his grotesque facsimiles of fading figures such as Captain Mark Phillips, Edward Heath and Jimmy Goldsmith more vivid than the originals. Fundamental to his strength as a satirist was, of course, his refreshing absence of good taste.

Auberon effectively gets a double since another of Brown’s picks is John Preston’s A Very English Scandal. This is about the Jeremy Thorpe affair in which he hired a hit man who bungled an assasination of a former lover. Auberon kept the story alive right through a trial. The book been adapted for a three-part TV series to air on BBC next month, according to Radio Times. See previous post.

A reader sent us a post by a blogger (Nigeness) who independently reached the same conclusion as Brown about the timeliness of Auberon’s diaries:

For bedtime reading, I recently plucked Auberon Waugh’s Four Crowded Years: Diaries, 1972-76 (Private Eye/ Andre Deutsch) off the shelf. It must be the best part of 40 years since I last looked at this collection, and I wasn’t at all sure it would still work – but I needn’t have worried: these ‘diaries’, set in a personal fantasy world loosely based on reality, are as funny as ever, yielding a laugh-aloud rate of at least once a page, which is very good going (if not terribly conducive to sleep). What’s more, the volume is illustrated by the great Nicolas Bentley, whose pictures perfectly fit Waugh’s humour, and it even has helpful footnotes to identify some of the forgotten figures of the Seventies. Amid all the comedy, there are moments of real insight and even foresight (I hesitate to say prophecy). As an equal-opportunities offender, the rectionary Waugh was very much in the vanguard.

After giving the example of a 1973 diary entry by Auberon recalling a 1970 article he wrote for the Times  in which he offended Muslims and incited mobs to burn down the British Council library in Rawalpindi (and for which he was sacked), the blogger concludes:

A quarter of a century on, nothing has changed (for the better) on that front. But happily such serious matters don’t often impinge on Waugh’s comic world, one firmly based on the puncturing of self-importance and pomposity – neither of which is ever in short supply, especially in the worlds of politics and the ‘yarts’.

UPDATE (16 April 2018): Thanks to Dave Lull for sending the blogpost about Auberon Waugh’s diaries.

 

 

Share
Posted in Auberon Waugh, Diaries, Newspapers | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Weekend Roundup: Waugh in the Book Reviews

The Daily Telegraph reviews a book by Julie Summers entitled Our Uninvited Guests about the wartime use of British country houses to shelter evacuated refugees from the bombed out cities or provide military bases. The review is by Robert Leigh-Pemberton and begins with an extensive quote from Evelyn Waugh. Although one assumes this would be taken from Waugh’s novel Put Out More Flags which had a plot that centered on this subject, instead it comes from a letter to his wife:

In the spring of 1942, Evelyn Waugh related in a letter to his wife how the colonel in charge of his commando, eager to be “chums” with the Earl of Glasgow, had offered to remove an offending stump from the peer’s woodland, promising “we can blow a tree down so that it lands on a sixpence” and that no new trees would be hurt.

Delighted, the earl invited the whole commando “to luncheon for the great explosion”. At the luncheon, the colonel, anxious not to disappoint Lord Glasgow, kept telling his young subaltern to “put a bit more” explosive in that tree. When the fuse was lit, the tree, “instead of falling quietly sideways, rose 50 feet into the air taking with it half an acre of soil and the whole of the young plantation”.

Lord Glasgow walked back to his castle “in dead silence” only to discover that every pane of glass in it had been shattered by the blast, whereupon “he gave a little cry and ran to hide his emotion in the lavatory and there, when he pulled the plug, the entire ceiling, loosened by the explosion, fell on his head…”

This letter is at risk of becoming a journalistic cliché as a result of its widespread appearance in theatrical performances of amusing letters. See previous posts. The Telegraph review continues:

The earl’s castle fared better than many houses requisitioned in Britain during the war. Julie Summers’s Our Uninvited Guests documents the variety of uses to which they were put, ordering them by the degree of horror that the prospect excited in the owners. At best, a house might be made into a girl’s school or a maternity hospital … At worst, it might become a full-blown military installation…

Waugh is also cited in several other book reviews this weekend. The Wall Street Journal reviews the collected editions of the works of Canadian-born writer Margaret Millar who was married to another more well known novelist writing under the name of Ross McDonald. They both wrote detective novels and lived in Santa Barbara which was the setting of many of her books. McDonald is best known for his Lew Archer series. His real name was Kenneth Millar and, according to the WSJ, he once made this comparison of one of his wife’s novels:

In “The Murder of Miranda” (1979), a lively later tale of nasty doings at a Southern California beach club, Millar surprisingly displayed a biting comic tone that reminded her husband, at least, of Evelyn Waugh’s. Kenneth Millar —Ross Macdonald—died in 1983.

The journal of the Jesuits, America, mentions Waugh in two reviews. The first is a reconsideration of a late and now neglected work by Mark Twain. In an essay by Ted Gioia on Twain’s book Recollections of Joan of Arc, Gioia claims that Twain considered it his best work and criticized those who read Huckleberry Finn and Tom Sawyer while ignoring what he thought was his masterpiece. One then expects him to draw a parallel with Evelyn Waugh’s own estimation of his historical novel Helena which Waugh thought was his best work and is also relatively neglected. Gioia misses that opportunity and instead brings Waugh into his review in this comparison:

[Twain] once stated that he had been taught “enmity toward everything that is Catholic,” and yet in his novel about Joan of Arc, Twain comes across as more passionately Catholic than even more famous writers aligned with the church, like Graham Greene, Walker Percy or Evelyn Waugh.

Finally, Waugh makes a brief and unexpected appearance in another America review. This is by Senior Editor, James T Keane, and considers four new books on the subject of Bob Dylan:

The most eclectic of recent books on Dylan but perhaps also the most entertaining is Robert Hudson’s The Monk’s Record Player: Thomas Merton, Bob Dylan, and the Perilous Summer of 1966. Hudson makes an ambitious claim: that Bob Dylan (né Robert Zimmerman) and Brother Louis (né Thomas Merton), though separated by age, creed, lifestyle and vocation, were virtual doppelgängers: “Although they lived their lives a thousand miles apart, their souls were next-door neighbors.”

Hudson’s thesis suffers from the awkward fact that the two never met, that Merton was twice Dylan’s age, and that there is little indication Dylan even knew who Merton was. But Hudson works mightily to make connections, and his quotations from Merton’s letters and diaries make it clear that the hermit was deeply affected by the vagabond’s music, first by “Highway 61 Revisited” (Hudson claims the title is a clear reference to Evelyn Waugh’s Brideshead Revisited), quickly followed by “Bringing It All Back Home,” “Another Side of Bob Dylan”and“The Times They Are A-Changin’.” In fact, in rueful diary entries concerning his famous love affair with “M,” Merton wrote that his troubles extended beyond the contradictions of being “a priest who has a woman.” He was also not sure he didn’t love Bob Dylan more than Mass in the vernacular…

Share
Posted in Brideshead Revisited, Catholicism, Evelyn Waugh, Helena, Letters, Newspapers, Put Out More Flags, World War II | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Weekend Roundup: Waugh in the Book Reviews